Representative bureaucracy: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 6:

In [[Samuel Krislov]]'s book, he states that in much, if not all, of bureaucracy's history, the perception of bureaucracy has had the identification of being entities covered in [[red tape]] and having an antagonistic approach to the [[public]]. Also with the association of these ideals heavily ingrained into the public, it is hard to think of the positive aspects of such representation. ( Krislov, Samuel. (2012). Representative Bureaucracy. Quid Pro Books)

There is some degree of disagreement over what constitutes representative bureaucracy as there is a lot of literature that exists on the subject as it has a long history. Scholars Groeneveld and Walle state that there are three dimensions of representative bureaucracy, the first is a historical one, the second is from the perspective of [[public administration]], and the third is in literature on [[Diversity (business)|diversity management]].<ref>{{Cite journal|title = A contingency approach to representative bureaucracy: power, equal opportunities and diversity|last1 = Groeneveld|first1 = S.|date = 2010|journal = International Review of Administrative Sciences|doi = 10.1177/0020852309365670|last2 = Walle|first2 = S.V.d.|volume = 76|issue = 2|pages = 239–258|s2cid = 153938539}}</ref>

== Global Representative Bureaucracy ==