Talk:No Gun Ri massacre: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 433:

: I just noticed a potentially serious issue with the text as proposed by Mr Hanley:

{{talkquote|At the same time, an Army intelligence report said one daylong search of refugee columns found no infiltrators, and a frontline Pentagon observer team described reports of civilian-clad infiltrators as “unconfirmed,” saying “strong flanking elements” of uniformed enemy troops were penetrating the gaps in U.S. lines.<ref>Eighth U.S. Army. July 23, 1950, Interrogation report, "North Korean methods of operation," Office of the Assistant Chief of Staff, G-2; and Office of the Chief of Army Field Forces. “Report of first OCAFF observer team to the Far East Command.” August 16, 1950. Cited in {{cite book | last1 = Hanley | first1 = Charles J. | title = Truth and Reconciliation in South Korea: Between the Present and Future of the Korean Wars | chapter = No Gun Ri: Official Narrative and Inconvenient Truths | editors = Jae-Jung Suh | publisher = Routledge | year = 2012 | location = London and New York | pages = 74 and 79 | isbn = 978-0-415-62241-7}}</ref>}}

: The report citing the "unconfirmed" reports of civilian-clad infiltrators is actually referring to unconfirmed reports of Nork troops using US uniforms to infiltrate. This would also appear to contradict many other reports from the time frame in questions where Nork troops were found to have . I would suggest Mr Hanley provide a copy of the report for all interested parties to evaluate. [[User:WeldNeck|WeldNeck]] ([[User talk:WeldNeck|talk]]) 18:49, 10 August 2015 (UTC)