User talk:Govindaharihari: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images

Line 17:

*Aww, thanks so much Gerda. What a delightful message. [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 05:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

:: ATwo yearyears ago, you were recipient no. [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Precious#Govindaharihari|1878]] of Precious, a prize of QAI! --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 2007:5928, 12 March 20192020 (UTC)

=== 2019 ===

<div style="margin: auto; max-width: 32em; {{box-shadow|: 0.1em| 0.1em| 0.5em| rgba( 192, 192, 192, 0.75 )}}; {{border-radius|: 1em}}; border: 1px solid #a7d7f9; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em 1em; color: black;" class="ui-helper-clearfix">

{{User QAIbox

| title =

Line 29:

| normal =

}}

<div class="center">

<br />'''Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht'''

Line 35:

[[Wikipedia:Main Page history/2019 January 1|begin it with music and memories]]<br /><br />

</centerdiv></div>

Not too late, I hope ;) --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 13:21, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

*No, not at all late [[User:Gerda Arendt]] - you are always on time amigo. Best wishes and good luck this year and every year. [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 13:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Line 181:

:{{ping|WQUlrich}} - yes, looking again, I agree, thanks [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 04:26, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

==Happy Holidays==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:0.5em 0.5em 0 0.5em; {{border-radius|: 1em}}; {{box-shadow|: 0.1em| 0.1em| 0.5em| rgba(0,0,0,0.75)}};<!--

-->;" class="plainlinks">[[File:Happy Holidays (2135831016).jpg|206px|left]][[File:Arbuckle Bros. (3093003361).jpg|177px|right]][[File:Season's Greetings, Christmas Card from 320 Ranch.jpg|205px|left]]{{Center|[[File:Happy Holidays text.png|301px]]}}

'''Hello Govindaharihari:''' Enjoy the '''[[Christmas and holiday season|holiday season]]''', and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand [[Wikipedia]]. Cheers, ''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .5em LightSkyBlue;">[[User:DBigXray|D<span style="color:#DA500B">Big</span>]][[User talk:DBigXray|X<span style="color:#10AD00">ray</span>ᗙ Happy Holidays!]]</span>'' 18:38, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Line 215:

*thanks Insertcleverphrasehere, I'll have a look at the instructions page and if I can I will help out when I can. [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 07:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"

|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Original Barnstar Hires.png|100px]]

|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''

|-

|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for the nice welcome. I inserted a section on the Dunning-Kruger Wikipedia Page in 2018 but edited nothing until last week when I saw someone had rewritten that section and distorted the meaning, so I updated it. A problem I did not recall having in 2018 was organizing the References and ending up with duplicated citations at the bottom of the full article. I think before that employing the automatic wizard feature allowed the program to recognize that the reference was already in the list, and the correct citation number was assigned in the text. I'm going in next to see if I can clean up the references cited section. I've not been able to figure out how to do that cleanup yet.. [[User:Browndog1212|Browndog1212]] ([[User talk:Browndog1212|talk]]) 21:11, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

|}

== Comments at BN ==

Hi. I have reverted your comments at BN. You are free to criticize the activity policy or question a user with advanced permissions as to if they need them, but you are not free to phrase it in such a way that is an attack on them. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 19:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

* Revert all you like but this was not a personal attack https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard&curid=2530810&diff=952924166&oldid=952923623 [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 19:53, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

::It was a vile sentiment to post, and I would have removed it as well but TonyBallioni hadn't beat me to it. -- [[User:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">Jezebel's '''Ponyo'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">''bons mots''</span>]]</sup> 20:06, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

:::There was nothing vile about it at all, ponyo [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 20:10, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

::::{{ec}} It's unfortunate that you believe that your comment was acceptable. There are other editors, such as {{U|Dennis Brown}} and {{U|Bradv}}, who share your concerns regarding activity levels that were able to express themselves clearly without demeaning a fellow volunteer. -- [[User:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">Jezebel's '''Ponyo'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Ponyo|<span style="color: Navy;">''bons mots''</span>]]</sup> 20:20, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

::::The general idea is that you can be critical of someone’s actions without being rude, combative, or making them seem somehow less. As an example: I could have phrased this much more directly, but instead I tried to appeal to the broad principles without commenting directly on you as a person. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 20:16, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

:::::I always try to be non combatative, however it is a joke that these advanced permissions are happily granted. My comment was not personal to the user , more to the laughable conditions, a joke as I said. [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 20:20, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

*I also think that to accuse me of a vile comment is a personal attack but , whaterver [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 20:23, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

::It was pretty rude and unnecessary in order to make your point. The current policy allows for this, so you are always welcome to start an RFC to change the Crat policy. Demeaning other editors isn't the solution and accomplishes nothing. [[User:Dennis Brown|<b>Dennis Brown</b>]] - [[User talk:Dennis Brown|<b>2&cent;</b>]] 20:36, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

:::this was the post - Fifty edits in the last ten years, get real, why you even have sysop priviledges is beyond a joke - it was not rude it was honest and it certainly was not vile . [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 20:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

::::Honesty and rudeness are not mutually exclusive. We frequently temper our words because other people have feelings and those also matter. You can be honest without insulting someone. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 20:45, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

*Also , I am sick of this attack here, I made one post and I have three editors attacking me here. [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 20:43, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

== April 2020 ==

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''36 hours''' for either trolling or being so out of sync with community norms on how to interact with others in a discussion that a block is needed, as you did at [[:WP:VPP]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;[[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 15:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-block -->

*[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)&diff=prev&oldid=953260850 This] type of behaviour after the above is just unacceptable. I’m not sure if you intended it as such, but implying that someone you disagree with is threatening legal action after making a personal attack on them previously isn’t an acceptable standard of conduct on this project. I’m also open to unblocking before this is up if you can agree not to comment on others going forward. This is where the problem comes from. Not a formal unblock condition, but an understanding that the recent comments towards others aren’t okay. If you show this, I’m fine with any administrator unblocking. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 15:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

*Well, thanks for that but I saw your block notice and never came back to find this offer. [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 17:59, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

== Help me to improve article of India ==

Manimajra was renamed as sector 13 legally by UT government of Chandigarh in January 2020 and by February 2020 the new name was finally declared to be written everywhere on papers.

Below are links to the decision:-

1). https://m.timesofindia.com/city/chandigarh/manimajra-to-be-renamed-sector-13-residents-elated/amp_articleshow/73114749.cms .

2). https://www.hindustantimes.com/chandigarh/chandigarh-s-manimajra-is-now-sector-13/story-ploFPCA4UGpDu9ksUxLtdL.html

Being a Indian resident, i would like to contribute to this new law which was passed by our government .

It is true that the proposal had been initially opposed in december 2019. In the initial proposal, names like Sector M or Sector 26 east were proposed.

Here is the link for initial proposals made :-

3)https://m.hindustantimes.com/chandigarh/manimajra-rwa-wants-number-not-m-after-sector/story-Q7ZPsdh5y120cEqlVAKuhP_amp.html

4)https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-chandigarh-to-finally-get-sector-13-after-54-years-of-formation-2813378

(these articles were published in newspapers in 2019 which is old).

5)https://m.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/chandigarh/mani-majra-to-be-sector-m-863728 (This link i provided over here was published in Tribune India in November 2019 )

But soon the {{highlight | final decision was made which overruled the previous proposals and finally the new name for manimajra was concluded as sector 13 by the beginning of 2020.}}

The next link (6th Link) was also published in Tribune India with the final decision which was declared in February 2020 :-

6)https://m.tribuneindia.com/news/chandigarh/its-official-mani-majra-is-sector-13-of-chandigarh-39042

Please help me by putting your vote in the panel [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mani_Majra#Requested_move_17_June_2020 discussion on the talk page section of Sector 13].

Here is an example on how to put your vote ___________.

*'''Support'''

*'''Strong Support'''

*'''Agreed'''

Click on the edit tab and please copy any 1 vote you want to put from the above or you can put you vote by putting a * star symbol followed by 3 apostrophe marks ' ' ' and then writing your word for vote like support, agreed etc and finally closing it with again 3 apostrophe marks ' ' ' in the end. [[User:Taal Saptak|Taal Saptak]] ([[User talk:Taal Saptak|talk]]) 01:23, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

== Lucas edit ==

I made an edit to the Lucas Cruikshank page earlier today with a brief description of his podcast and a link to the YouTube channel. This was rejected because there is already a link to his YouTube but I'm confused as the channel I linked is separate to his "Lucas" channel. Would it be better to link to the website https://brosbeforehoes.libsyn.com/ instead?

[[User:Kittysunshine321|Kittysunshine321]] ([[User talk:Kittysunshine321|talk]]) 15:58, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

:Hi and thanks. Could you show me any independant notability for the details to be added? What wikipedia does is report what other sources have reported. Too many primary links start to become promotional rather than reporting other reliable reports. [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 16:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Ok then apologies I guess I just thought it was allowed as every other youtuber with a podcast seems to have it listed on their Wikipedia page. Thanks for your response [[User:Kittysunshine321|Kittysunshine321]] ([[User talk:Kittysunshine321|talk]]) 16:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

:You are welcome to open a discussion to get other opinions on the article talkpage Kittysunshine321 to get other opinions, thanks [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 16:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">

<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

</td></tr>

</table>

<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=990308429 -->

== reviewing concern ==

Hi Govindaharihari, I hope you are well. Regarding your recent edits at [[Kid Cudi]], I'm not sure if you realized but in [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/992912699 these] [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/992913091 three] [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/992916170 edits] you violated the [[WP:3RR]] rule, which states: "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period". You did so in less than twenty minutes, but I'm refraining from templating you considering you seem to be an experienced user. Please kindly be more careful in future, especially considering the editors you reverted did nothing wrong; everything was sourced within that Twitter reference, and per [[WP:TWITTER]], self-published sources/tweets/Instagram posts are fine to use, so long as they don't make exceptional claims. Take care. Thank you. [[User:AshMusique|AshMusique]] ([[User talk:AshMusique|talk]]) 20:49, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

:Hi there. I don't believe blp reviewing is regarded as edit warring, I support all my reviewing edits edits there , feel free to raise any concerns you have . regards. [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 20:58, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

== Precious anniversary ==

{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Two}} --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 06:56, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

thank you so much Gerda [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 20:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

: Thank you for what you said on [[User talk:SlimVirgin]] - [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gerda_Arendt&oldid=1031060378 missing pictured on my talk], with music full of hope and reformation --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 19:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

::thank you Gerda, for spreading love as you go. [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 21:41, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

== Escapism ==

You reverted my link to [[escapism]] by stating "Sorry, can't accept that without supportiing links". What links do you need to link to Wikipedia's definition of escapism? [[User:Dimadick|Dimadick]] ([[User talk:Dimadick|talk]]) 14:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, please offer me a link so I can investigate, thanks [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 14:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">

<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>

</td></tr>

</table>

<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1056563328 -->

== Precious anniversary ==

{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Four}} --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 13:34, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

:Thanks Gerda. I have still the ambition to improve the project, hugs [[User:Govindaharihari|Govindaharihari]] ([[User talk:Govindaharihari#top|talk]]) 19:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">

<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>

<div class="ivmbox-text">

Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2022|2022 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>

</div>

<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1124425179 -->