User talk:Kwamikagami/Archive 16: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 458:

:::Well, Kotniski, you know the conspiracy is real. The six months the article was supposedly stable didn't really exist: I forged the page history to cover up the True History which was exactly as you would have it. Too bad I covered my tracks so well no-one will ever be able to prove it.

:::And when I asked any other admin who could see a consensus to revert the page to the appropriate version, I'm sure you've noticed how no-one stepped forward. That's because we're all in this together. Actually, we're all just socks of Noetica: none of us actually exist. — [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 10:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

::::As you obviously know, the contention is not that the page was not stable at that version for that much time, but that the consensus following the current discussion is clearly for the other version (which was also stable for an even longer time before that, as it happens, and was changed six months ago without much attention). If you support one editor who disagrees with the result of a discussion (even though he didn't even condescend to take part in the discussion or give any reasons for preferring his version), over a clear supermajority who have given their reasons for taking the opposite viewpoint, then surely you can see how the normal consensus-based decision-making process (which doesn't require unanimity, as we know) has been manifestly disrupted? (And the fact that no other admin stepped forward doesn't mean they all agreed with you - they probably had better things to do than look into a matter that you looked to have already handled.)--[[User:Kotniski|Kotniski]] ([[User talk:Kotniski|talk]]) 11:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)