User talk:Kwamikagami/Archive 16: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 467:

::::::::That's all. No endless scroll of mumbo-jumbo. Get over the past; and also, step aside and let others edit WP:TITLE and WP:MOSCAPS, when the disruptions you have abetted are over and the recent protection at MOSCAPS has expired. If you don't know what an "adjective derived from a proper noun" ''is'', don't put an example in.

::::::::<font color="blue"><big>N</big><small>oetica</small></font>^{<small>[[User_talk:Noetica |Tea?]]</small>} 11:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

:::::::::You both know perfectly well that the most recent, and fullest, discussion concluded conclusively that "my old" wording was preferable to the "new" version. There really should be nothing more to it than that. Your stuff about threats and corruption and fiascos is utter nonsense - while you're on your high horse, decent editors are ''actually discussing things'' properly and reaching conclusions. But of course Kwami's an admin, so he gets to be "right", even if the facts on the talk page are unanswerable. Anyway, I've said as much as I'm going to - I remain disgusted with the both of you, and I'm quite sure you know why. (It's not that I care that much about those particular words being on the policy - I've already proposed rewriting that whole section - but when I see proper collaborative processes being so transparently compromised as this, and an admin either colluding in it or apparently unable to see through it, then it destroys what little faith I had in Wikipedia's decision-making procedures.) Please make one or two more streams of insults against me, then that will be the end of the thread.--[[User:Kotniski|Kotniski]] ([[User talk:Kotniski|talk]]) 12:29, 23 January 2012 (UTC)