User talk:Philc 0780: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Article Images

Line 1:

~~==Are all these templates really neccesary==~~

There are so many templates on wikipedia nowadays. It seems so many are irrelevant, template cruft, though this has become something of a feature of wikipedia since i joined. Nobody actually wants to contribute useful information to the project, just show off their wiki-coding schools by adding useless crap, that can just about justify itself to the point of not being immediately deleted. This isnt myspace, if you want to show off coding skills go there! these templates are useless. Almost all templates found at the bottom of pages are far better off being categories, as they have no benefit as being a template, and simply clutter the articles. Thank you. [[User:Philc_0780|Philc]] 21:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

~~[[User talk:Philc 0780/currarchive|Current]]~~

~~==[[James Milner]] Career section==~~

Not really asking for full feedback on this article (although I wouldn’t mind it). I’d just like to know what you feel the best way the divide up the Career section is, by Club, by season, not at all or some other way. Please leave your reply under the section in my talk page named “Milner Career section”. [[User:Bole2|Buc]] 16:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

~~== Epicurus ==~~

Phil, if you are still around, and if you are still interested, the quotation from Epicurus is to be found in O'Connor at pages 64-5. The wording varies slightly, though not much, from that which I remembered, so I must have picked it up from a different translation. My apologies for taking so long over this. [[User:Clio the Muse|Clio the Muse]] 00:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

~~== Speedy deletion of [[Template:FA Premier League winners]] ==~~

A tag has been placed on [[Template:FA Premier League winners]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#T3|section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

~~Thanks. --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride|talk]]) 02:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)~~

~~== Deleted image ==~~

Hi, Phil. The image you asked about was deleted with the summary "was an image with fair use tag but no fair use rationale for more than seven days." Image licenses are REALLY not an area I dabble in much. You would get a much better answer from [[User: ^demon|^demon]], the editor who actually deleted it. [[User:Joyous!|Joyous!]] | [[User talk:Joyous!|Talk]] 02:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

~~==AfD nomination of Fandangle==~~

[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left]]I have nominated [[Fandangle]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fandangle (2nd nomination)]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  [[User:Graymornings|Graymornings]][[User_talk:Graymornings|(talk)]] 19:33, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

~~== RE: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NJR_ZA&redirect=no#Pilanesberg Pilanesberg] ==~~

I don't have a ref right now. On leave, so I have a slow connection; will look for some when I am back home in ten days or so. Pilanesberg was never one of the [[South African National Parks]], but it was considered the National Park of the former apartheid [[Homeland]]/[[Bantustan]] of [[Bophutatswana]]. Some people still refer to it as Pilanesberg National Park, but the official name is [[Pilanesberg Game Reserve]]. It is managed by [[North West Parks and Tourism Board]] rather than [[South African National Parks]]. --[[User:NJR ZA|NJR_ZA]] ([[User talk:NJR ZA|talk]]) 17:24, 9 January 2009 (UTC)