Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 391:

I believe the three accounts listed above to be sockpuppet accounts. Each was created apparently solely to undo this edit and appears to have deep knowledge of Wikipedia rules for a first or second time editor. Very suspicious behavior. I made these edits in good faith as an attempt to better explain the topic in question using a reliable source, an author in the field who has been quoted by news sources including the Washington Post and CBC. [[User:Eric1985|Eric]] ([[User talk:Eric1985|talk]]) 22:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

hello I do not know what is going on here but the reason why I reverted is because the source is unreliable and did list wiki as a point of ref there was a red link on the page which listed wiki as the ref for midlife crisis def which for some reason dose not anymore which I find weird. http://debramacleod.com/mans-midlife-crisis-turns-marital-terrorism/ I do not have a deep knowledge of Wikipedia I just figured that wiki should not list sources that also link Wikipedia as it source I have been reading the rules of Wikipedia since I have created this account and checking the user page of the person that wants that ref in to see if he was violating any rules and to see if he had done so before I figured that his page would be a good place to look user is being mean and a bully because they do not like the fact that there source is not reliable and removed and I did find out that they were blocked before first the user accuses of meat puppet which I do not know what that is but will look it up soon which he dose solely because of the first revert by {{userlinks|Hotaka222}} for saying it is non credible then goes on saying on the talk page that I have don no other edits outside of the midlife crisis page which I have. I have not done anything wrong at all and do not appreciate this user just trying to get his way by being mean I came too help contribute to this site not to deal with people like him I will not be commenting again nor will I be editing again regardless of how this turns out thou I am sure if the user dose put the ref back in another user will take it out eventually because the source is not good goodbye and farewell <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Kinggoblin|Kinggoblin]] ([[User talk:Kinggoblin#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Kinggoblin|contribs]]) 23:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

::I find it very suspicious that this rarely edited article was edited by three brand new accounts three days in a row reverting my edits. I believe these three accounts are owned by the same person. Can an admin view if they were from the same IP address? [[User:Kinggoblin]] just created this new account today and claims to not know anything about Wikipedia but was able to figure out how to put a template on my talk page. The whole thing does not feel right to me after seeing other such events in my last 10+ years as a Wikipedia user. Further, the writing in the two responses above appears to be in the same writing style, further supporting my theory. I will refrain from any further comments/edits until an administrator can review. Thank you. [[User:Eric1985|Eric]] ([[User talk:Eric1985|talk]]) 23:19, 25 February 2017 (UTC)