User talk:80.136.201.113 - Wikipedia
2 people in discussion
Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Talk:Charles Shaar Murray—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Thank you for the message although you appear to have mistaken me for someone who gives a shit whether you consider that contribution was constructive or not.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Talk:Charles Shaar Murray. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Please stick your message where the monkey sticks its nuts. Also, the edit was opinion not vandalism.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Talk:Charles Shaar Murray, you may be blocked from editing. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
- You appear to have some difficulties with comprehending simple English. Please read the following carefully:
- The edit was opinion not vandalism.
- I don't care about your assessment regarding what is disruptive editing.
- I won't give a rat's fart if I'm blocked, although I'm sure you'll get a small thrill when it's done: a meaningless and petty power trip.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Talk:Charles Shaar Murray. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
- @PhilKnight could you revoke TPA? Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply