User talk:MelroseReporter - Wikipedia


1 person in discussion

Article Images

Following a successful appeal to the Arbitration Committee, MelroseReporter (talk · contribs) is unblocked (as time served) subject to a one-account restriction. This restriction may be appealed after 6 months have elapsed. For the Arbitration Committee, Izno (talk) 03:50, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! I tried to edit, and got the blocked message again. MelroseReporter (talk) 06:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § MelroseReporter unblocked

If you continue to edit disruptively at Shungite you will be blocked. Discuss any change younwish to see made by proposing them at talk:Shungite first. Do not make changes before you have consensus to make them. --Tagishsimon (talk) 13:59, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Talk:Shungite while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 21:12, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

You have recently edited a page related to pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Galobtter (talk) 23:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Have you edited Wikipedia with other accounts? Bon courage (talk) 08:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tagishsimon (talk) 20:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply