User talk:Visetenet - Wikipedia

  Hello, I'm HMSLavender. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Abortion in Ohio seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 03:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Abortion in Pennsylvania. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 03:39, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

How are my edits not neutral? Visetenet (talk) 03:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm afraid 'killing babies' is not an acceptable phrase to use as our articles cannot take sides in subjects like this. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 03:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey, what’s wrong with my edits. Visetenet (talk) 03:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Abortion in Texas, you may be blocked from editing. Cassiopeia talk 03:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, can you please explain what the problem is? Visetenet (talk) 03:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

What’s the problem with my edits? Visetenet (talk) 03:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Same-sex marriage. Cassiopeia talk 04:02, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

My edit wasn’t vandalism. I simply used a single word that means the same thing as “same-sex” Visetenet (talk) 04:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Visetenet,

Visetenet, Good day. The article name is Same-sex marriage and not same-gender marriage, so pls do not change sex to gender as you did. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 04:12, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

But science has proven that gender has nothing to do with sex. The way the article is now means that a marriage between a woman and a trans woman would not be considered “same-sex” since the trans woman is in fact a man simply masquerading as a woman. Using “same-gender” would be more inclusive to LGBTQIALMNOP+ people Visetenet (talk) 04:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tran woman is not a born woman and is not a egg carrier nor have uterus or can give birth. Tran women are born not female. I am not American and my understand is that American is very big in this topic but not the rest of the world. Your opinion and mine are irrelevant in Wikipedia (I am not against LGBDQ+ community) because info added/changed need to be supported by independent, reliable source (from any languages around the world) and if any info is sensitive, discussion needs to be raised and resolved the issue. You can go to the article talk page to raise your opinion and get a discussion going (be polite and civil as this is the Wikipedia guidelines). A consensus agreement need to be achieved for changing such info and a non involved editor/admin will decide the outcome and do not change the to the outcome of the discussion. Btw, since, be careful what you edit as you have final warnings and if you violate the Wikipedia guidelines again, you will be blocked. Be safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 04:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

“Tran woman is not a born woman and is not a egg carrier nor have uterus or can give birth. Tran women are born not female.”

This is a very transphobic statement. I would recommend striking it to avoid being blocked for transphobia Visetenet (talk) 04:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

No, it is not transphobic statement as I just stating fact as I know it and I am not attacking any one here. I have over 100 LGBDQ+ friends and I joined LGBDQ+ volleyball sport club for years and not only practicing with them but also participate/competition with them in World Gay games in Sydney Australia years ago. Also, pls remember, the article name and subject is about "Same-sex marriage" and not "Same-gender marriage" and Wikipedia is not a social planform but an encyclopedia, your and my opinions are not regarded as Wikipedia content is based on independent, reliable source and not editors' believes or opinions. Take care Visetenet and have a good day. Cassiopeia talk 04:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply