User talk:W. P. Uzer - Wikipedia


1 person in discussion

Article Images

Hi,

I moved a dubious paragraph from Prop-word to Talk:Prop-word. I didn't think to check the history beforehand - but now that I did, I see that you pretty much authored the article by yourself, so I figured I should let you know. Obviously, do feel free to revert, should you decide that the point I raised doesn't bear on the situation after all.

Cheers,

- 2A02:560:4251:7C00:7C1B:AEED:C343:273 (talk) 10:37, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Woman's right to choose. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 13#"Right to choose" redirects until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (they/she) | o toki tawa mi. 06:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blush. That'll teach me to check even what is obviously obvious. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 10:50, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Vrl has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

After you reverted their edits on the List of Peppa Pig characters, they went and added all that false info back. Could you please change it back to the way it was, and report that user to the admins if necessary? If so, thanks! 2600:2B00:8A01:7000:B485:D7E2:BBAE:E74F (talk) 12:38, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I agree with your edit at King Lear. I think what it's aiming at is that the identity of the character who takes the throne at the end of the play is different in the two different early texts of the play (although, if so, what was there is a ludicrous way of expressing that!). I'll have a look to see if I can source, and improve, that on the weekend. At the moment I'm struggling to think of a good way to express it that wouldn't break the flow of the synopsis. AndyJones (talk) 12:11, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply