Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Crawford (Nitro Girl) - Wikipedia


Article Images
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge any reliably sourced information relevant to an encyclopedic article on Nitro Girls (otherwise delete). —Centrxtalk • 21:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Crawford (Nitro Girl) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Contested prod. Fails WP:BIO and WP:A. has been tagged for failing WP:A since August '06. If merger is supported by consensus (as appears to be) will support that rather than delete. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 10:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

#1-sign your posts like this: ~~~~ . #2 The debate is not a vote; please make recommendations on the course of action to be taken, sustained by arguments (WP:AFD). ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 11:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into Nitro Girls sounds like the best idea. Govvy 20:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into Nitro Girls. Subject isn't notable enough for her own article. Jeff Silvers 13:07, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Leave it be -- Would not delete as other NG's have articles & to merge all the individual girls articles into the main article would make a mumbo jumbo mess. Keep the Nitro Girls article as a history of the group while keeping the Bios of the girls on thier respective pages. (Please forgive me if I am formatting this properly as this is the first time I have ever edited/contributed on Wiki. Thanks for your Patience & Understanding) Joe 08:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Not all Nitro Girls have their own articles. Even if they did, that wouldn't justify keeping this one; the article should be judged on its own merits, not whether a similar article already exists. Jeff Silvers 06:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.