Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fandamentalism - Wikipedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was consensus to delete. Johnleemk | Talk 02:42, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neologism, claimed explicitly by the blog post http://kfmonkey.blogspot.com/2004/12/fandamentalism.html that is the sole reference for this page. 66.191.124.236 06:23, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as neologism - no evidence presented of wide spread of word. A613 Google results doesn't indicate widespread use see [1]. Capitalistroadster 06:34, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Most all of those Google hits are actually misspellings of "fundamentalism." Not much evidence "fandamentalism" is being used at all. Mark K. Bilbo 14:52, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• BJAODN and Delete - common mis-spelling though, some of the google hits were funny. I feel sorry for the professional journalists who stored their pages as "fandamentalism" when talking about extremism. I hope they didn't get fired for it. Oh there's also another silly hit about it being used in its proper context [2] (as in, not a mis-spelling), and there's probably others as well. But just a joke really, I think. Zordrac 20:04, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Preaky 01:09, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it's as observed by old bill - Shakespear, " full of sound n fury signifying nothing!" sum

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.