Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Pallotta - Wikipedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Olaf Davis (talk) 13:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Pallotta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable player no professional experience or major individual award. Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 17:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. —DJSasso (talk) 18:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Junior A/Canadian university is not a notable level of play. Resolute 18:15, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment He was on the All-Rookie team in University. Which is a notable award. But there are no references so I am leaning towards probably delete unless some references can be found. -DJSasso (talk) 18:16, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not sure I'd consider a CIS award as notable, myself, given it is a glorified senior league. Resolute 18:21, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I am prone to agree with you, but I think the level of play is still pretty close to the NCAA so I would be hard pressed to discount it automatically, if significant coverage of him can be found. -DJSasso (talk) 18:22, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• And I would note, I can only find listings that he did win. But no significant coverage. -DJSasso (talk) 18:30, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not sure being on the All-Rookie team of the CIS is notable. I don't know of an equivalent award that exists for the NCAA, but I don't think an "All-Freshman Team" at the NCAA level would make someone notable either. For NCAA, I think Hobey Baker or an appearance on the All-American team should be the guideline. Patken4 (talk) 21:29, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• "All-Rookie" was all that I needed to see to know that this one is a delete. Even pro players are of questionable notability until certain standards are met. Hopefully he'll meet those in the future, but he isn't there yet. Heather (talk) 01:35, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.