This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was initially tagged by Broichmore as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Selfie, does not meet any notability criteria, this is not facebook The tag was removed out of process by RZuo in special:diff/928483698. Β β πΊπ¦Jeff G. γ please ping or talk to meπΊπ¦ 16:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- describe "process". RZuo (talk) 16:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @RZuo: "If anyone disagrees with the speedy deletion of a particular file, please convert to a regular deletion request" per Commons:Deletion policy#Speedy deletion. Β β πΊπ¦Jeff G. γ please ping or talk to meπΊπ¦ 16:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- i'll put down everything once and for all before you even reply.
- the deletion reason is bogus.
- it's not a selfie.
- there's no com:csd about "notability criteria".
- i added it to two categories, one of which Category:IMovie shows this is for now the only file showing a person using imovie. i dont expect a deletion request based on com:scope would even be plausible.
- i clicked one of the two buttons "remove this tag". rejection of bogus templates by any commons user is self explanatory. what process? i expect an explanation for the rash accusation.
- the deletion reason is bogus.
- RZuo (talk) 16:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Yann: did you just delete "the only file showing a person using imovie"?--RZuo (talk) 16:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, but I don't see how you could argue that this file illustrates that. If anything, this could illustrate a teenager's desktop, but nothing else. Yann (talk) 16:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Yann: how do you argue that https://www.flickr.com/photos/fabola/23491654620/ is not someone using imovie on a mac and moving the mouse?
- even if you cannot see the software is imovie, there is only 1 other file File:Video Producer in Cape Town.jpg showing a person and cat:video editing software, which shows a man who's not using the software but instead looking at the camera.--RZuo (talk) 16:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- "someone using iMovie" is different than a picture that could illustrate that use. The screen is blurry, and since it is a free software, anyone can create a useful picture or video. This is not one of them. Yann (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Yann: can you find another commons file that shows a girl using video editing software or specifically imovie before 5 oct (7 days from 28 sep)?
- and i dont see how this flickr image is in any way inferior to commercial stock photos of the same motif https://www.gettyimages.de/search/2/image?phrase=girl%20edit%20video https://www.shutterstock.com/search/girl-edit-video .
- on top of that, imovie is proprietary software by apple. the slightly blurry screen is just a perfect middle ground such that it cannot be considered a copyright violation of the proprietary software but still is recognisable enough as a girl editing videos.--RZuo (talk) 16:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- "someone using iMovie" is different than a picture that could illustrate that use. The screen is blurry, and since it is a free software, anyone can create a useful picture or video. This is not one of them. Yann (talk) 16:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, but I don't see how you could argue that this file illustrates that. If anything, this could illustrate a teenager's desktop, but nothing else. Yann (talk) 16:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
