User talk:Cherurbino - Wikimedia Commons
1 person in discussion
Article ImagesCategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
- Image:Anatoliy Denisov.jpg was uncategorized on 20 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
- Image:Cherurbino.jpg was uncategorized on 8 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
- Image:Kiev commercial institute.jpg was uncategorized on 4 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
- Image:Melmoth the Wanderer 1820.png was uncategorized on 27 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 28 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
- Image:Melmoth the Wanderer 1833 (rus).png was uncategorized on 27 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 28 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
- Image:OXBAT 1915.png was uncategorized on 22 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:BorzenkoSemyonBorisovichInterview.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Dogad75 (talk) 21:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
- I disagree, for it relates to the garden desing. The earlier photo of the same place exists at commons and is displayed in the same article, and nobody requested its deletion. Cherurbino (talk) 07:16, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
- Also, the "artwork" like sculpture supposes that an artist has signed it, or his name is made publicly known. The photos, reproduced at the graves, are always made by anonimous cemetry workers. Cherurbino (talk) 07:30, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your recent file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. Sealle (talk) 22:26, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
- Hi, dear @Sealle: , I really appreciate your warning and shall be obliged if you specify the recent uploads that you mention, which may have drawn your attention. During the last weeks I've uploaded many files, mostly the details of old (>100, before 1918) maps, but not only. I stand up for the list of files which you might considered doubtful and shall certainly fix the flaws if there are any. Thank you in advance. Cherurbino (talk) 10:20, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Copyright status: File:Gösta Säflund (1903-2004).jpg
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Gösta Säflund (1903-2004).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Ahmadtalk 16:04, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Copyright status: File:Blocks east of Moskovsky chaussee, Petersburg, 1912.png
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Blocks east of Moskovsky chaussee, Petersburg, 1912.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Park Pobedy Evolution (1912-1933).png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Komendantskoye Pole (1917, Petrograd).png
- File:Russian Railway Finance by 1870.png
- File:Doppelten BogenKreuzungsweichen, Petersburger S-Bahn, 1907.png
- File:Gostiny Dvor in Petrograd as of 1917.gif
- File:Nystad Street Evolution 1903-1927.png
- File:Shosseinaya-Aeroport railway stations.png
- File:Peterburg railway junctions? early 1880-ies.png
- File:Soedinitelnaya Vetka in Petersburg (1884).jpg
- File:Le bâtiment de tuerie communale de Petrograd en 1913.jpg
- File:Putilov Bahnstrecke in Petersburg, 1912.jpg
Yours sincerely, VLu (talk) 15:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- Done
Wrong CC-BY-SA licenses for all the files from this list are now replaced with the proper license templates. Yours sincerely, Cherurbino (talk) 22:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Copyright status: File:Sim3464 USGS Jezero Perseverance exploration ellipse.png
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文(简体) ∙ 中文(繁體) ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Sim3464 USGS Jezero Perseverance exploration ellipse.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:05, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Hi! For unknown reasons ))) I did not put brackets around 'PD-USGov-USGS'. Now brackets are on their place, and I hope its okay now. Thank you, Cherurbino (talk) 10:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
2A02:2168:A01:45E9:0:0:0:1 21:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
2A02:2168:A01:45E9:0:0:0:1 22:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply