User talk:Markus Bärlocher - Wikimedia Commons

2 people in discussion

Article Images

Welcome to the Commons, Markus Bärlocher!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

Goodies, tips and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak.
All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper

Made a mistake?

Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
For more information read the full Deletion guidelines

(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Moin Markus! Danke für all die schönen Knotenbilder!! Könntest Du sie noch in die entsprechenden Unterkategorien packen? Es ist eh schon manchmal einige Arbeit, die Kategorien übersichtlich zu halten, wenn da so ein Riesenschwung unvollständig kategorisierter Bilder hereinkommt, wird das etwas zu viel. Zumal die Kategorie Knoten hoffentlich sehr benutzerfreundlich (wenn Du dem gelben Link folgst, findest Du alle relevanten Knoten-Unterkategorien auf deutsch und mit Bild), also bitte-bitte nicht die Oberkategorien verstopfen. Herzlichen Dank!! --Ibn Battuta 16:36, 18 March 2008 (UTC) PS: Falls Du dieses Werkzeug noch nicht kennen solltest - kannst Du in den Einstellungen, letzte Karteikarte, aktivieren und erlaubt dann über ein Feld in der rechten Bildschirmecke immerhin etwas schnelleres Umkategorisieren. PPS: Falls Du Vorschläge hast, um die Knoten-Kategorie zu verbessern bzw. benutzerfreundlicher zu machen, sehr gern Bescheid geben!!Reply

Du kannst gern alle Knotenbilder von de.Wikipedia auf Commons übernehmen. Ebenfalls wäre gut, wenn alle Knotenbilder von de.Wikibooks hier verfügbar wären. Die Unterkategorien machen so übrigens wenig Sinn, da fehlt eine Systematik (und ist auch nicht wirklich sinnvoll, solange es nur knapp hundert Knoten mit ein paar Detail- oder Howto-Bildern sind). Falls es mal mehr werden, können die Kategorien aus Liste der Knoten übernommen werden (Basis, Schlinge, Schlaufe, Festmacher, Verbindung, Spleiss, Takling). Gruss, --Markus 20:09, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wenn Du die Unterkategorien nicht sinnvoll findest, kannst Du gern helfen, das zu ändern. Bisher ist der "Sinn" schlicht: Jeder Knoten mit mehreren Bildern bekommt eine eigene Kategorie, fertig. Jedenfalls wäre es nett, wenn Du entweder die Unterkategorien nutzen oder sie ändern könntest. Nur die Oberkategorie mit dorthin nicht passenden Bildern aufzufüllen, hilft ja keinem der Beteiligten. Vielen Dank, Ibn Battuta 13:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mit Kategorien und deren Handhabung auf WP/Commons kenne ich mich nicht aus. "Für jeden Knotennamen eine Kategorie" macht aber m.E. keinen Sinn, da die Bezeichnungen in jeder Region und jeder Anwendergruppe anders lauten, teilweise werden sogar gleiche Wörter für unterschiedliche Knoten verwendet. Und hin-und-her-Übersetzung aus verschiedenen Sprachen macht das Chaos komplett. Wie wärs einfach mit einer Kategorie:Seilknoten? Wenn schon mal alle Knoten unter "Knoten" kategoriesiert wären, könnte man sie wenigstens finden.

Es gibt noch ein paar grundsätzliche Verbesserungsbedarfe im Zusammenwirken von unseren Bilderdatenbanken. Habe mal ein paar Verbesserungsvorschläge in WP geschrieben. Gruss, --Markus 12:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sheet bend.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Tippfehler - erledigt. --Markus (talk) 00:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:34, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image:GEBCO-OpenSeaMap-Water-depth-Gibraltar.jpg was uncategorized on 14 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:34, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:GEBCO-Waterdepth-OpenSeaMap-Atlanitct-1024x513.jpg was uncategorized on 14 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:34, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:GEBCO-OpenSeaMap-Water-depts-Nordatlantic.jpg was uncategorized on 14 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:34, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello Markus, I have used and enjoyed your wonderful knot images in many Wikipedia articles... I am sorry to be writing to you for the first time about a problem with one of your images, but I wanted to make sure you were included in the conversation. You may have seen the discussion at de:Diskussion:Bulin 1.5 about the issue with File:Bulin 1.5.jpg. I just started a discussion at File talk:Bulin 1.5.jpg about how best to retain the image in order to illustrate this possible "mis-tying" of the Yosemite bowline. My understanding of the German language is limited, so please feel free to correct any errors or misinterpretations I may have made. Thanks and best regards! --Dfred (talk) 14:24, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi and thanks for the flowers :-)

I answered in the Commons-discu... --Markus (talk) 23:11, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, OpenSeaMap, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

--Motopark (talk) 13:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Motopark (talk) 14:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hallo,

Du hast mir vor einem guten Monat eine Mail geschrieben. Tatsächlich finden sich die Häuser nicht auf der Karte wieder, weil mir ein Fehler unterlaufen ist. Die Fähre fährt zwischen Stahlbrode und Glewitz, nicht ab Schaprode. Habe die Bezeichnung im Foto ([File:Schaprode, Fähre, by Klugschnacker in Wikipedia (2014-08-03) (4).JPG]) geändert, danke für den Hinweis! --Zwölfhundertvierunddreißig (talk) 20:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Markus, ich habe Wikimail deaktiviert, aber E-Mail-Adressen mit speravir@… und dann arcor.de, freenet.de oder, wenn es dir lieber ist, bei Google, also gmail.com. Wenn Du mir die EPS-Dateien zukommen lässt (am besten gepackt), kann ich sie in PDF umwandeln oder, da ich dort selbst keine Erfahrung habe, versuchen, sie in das eigentlich favorisierte SVG zu konvertieren. Ich würde sie dir dann wieder zuschicken, damit Du sie selbst hochladen kannst. — Speravir – 17:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Markus,

ich habe File:Seilrutsche als Rettungsmittel.jpg nicht in höherer Auflösung. Das Bild hier auf Commons ist das Original, so wie es aus der Kamera kam. Aber ich habe nochmal in meinem Fundus getaucht und zwei weitere Bilder von demselben Ereignis rausgesucht, auf denen man die Aufhängung besser erkennen kann, siehe „Andere Versionen“ auf der Bildbeschreibung. Ist Dir ist damit geholfen? Gruß, --Rotkraut (talk) 20:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Themightyquill (talk) 08:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Affected:

File:Abdeckung Mittelamerika.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

тнояsтеn ⇔ 07:44, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Krd 04:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

LutzBruno (talk) 19:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ich antworte mal hier, weil ich ungern meine private E-mail preisgeben möchte. Das Problem mit den Bildern des Magazins ist, das Du wohl keine Rechte an diesen Zeitungen hast. Ich meine die Fotos auf den Titelseiten. Die liegen entweder beim Verlag, und/oder beim Fotografen. Nur diese Können die Bilder hier zur freien Nutzung lizenzieren. Also entweder Du findest heraus, bei wem die Rechte heute liegen (Nachfolgeverlag, Erben oder die Beteiligten selbst) und bringst diese dazu hier die Freigabe zu bestätigen, oder wir können diese Bilder hier nicht Nutzen. Die Rechte gehen auch nach dem Tod des Urhebers auf Erben über und bleiben i.d. Regel 70 Jahre geschützt. Bitte bedenke das andere Nutzer, die die von dir hochgeladenen Bilder im guten Glauben nutzen, dann aber hohe Abmahnstrafen von Anwälten der Rechteinhaber zu erwarten haben. Ich glaube, das möchtest du nicht. LG LutzBruno (talk) 00:04, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello Markus Bärlocher, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Freizeit im Sattel Cover 90-11.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:31, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 01:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

P.g.champion (talk) 12:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Markus, pass ein bißchen auf, wenn du auf einer Commons-Seite etwas posted und überschreibe nicht einfach den gesamten vorhandenen Text, wie du es hier gemacht hast. --Túrelio (talk) 21:55, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Mein Rechner war grad abgestürzt. Dabei gingen die Anmeldedaten verloren - und wohl sonst noch irgendwas schief. Sorry und danke für's Richten :-) Gruss, --Markus (talk) 22:06, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alter Globus etwa 19xx - Afrika.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:29, 23 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alter Globus etwa 19xx - Nordamerika.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:30, 23 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alter Globus etwa 19xx - Südamerika.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:30, 23 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Globus etwa 19xx.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:40, 23 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alter Globus etwa 19xx - Südchinesisches Meer.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:07, 24 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alter Globus etwa 19xx - Westafrika.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:07, 24 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, please do not add OTRS permission templates to files. Only OTRS agents are allowed to do so. Files with OTRS templates placed by a non OTRS agent will be speedy deleted. Jcb (talk) 22:37, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Moin Markus,
wir werden Deinen Außentermin am Samstag besprechen, jeder der keine Vorträge hören will, kann gerne hingehen, es ist aber kein Angebot der Veranstaltung, da der Verein (der einige unterstüzt) sicher nicht damit einverstanden wäre.
Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 17:43, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nachtrag: Wie ich sehe ist es ja bei WikiDach mit drin. ;)

Es kommt zu spät und würde zu lange dauern. Laß bitte politische Themen wie die Demos raus aus dem Fotoworkshop, das ist nicht unser Thema. Wenn, dann hätten das alle Teilnehmer vorher beschließen müssen. Vielleicht hast du ja eine Idee, wie Drohnenfliegerei bei Openseamp helfen kann? Als Ideen, die man diskutieren kann, nicht praktisch. Für praktische Anwendungen ist es viel zu spät. Es gibt in D sehr restriktive Gesetzgebungen für Drohnenflug, nicht alles, was wünschenswert ist, ist auch realisierbar. Mal die Elbe von HH nach CUX langfliegen und hochaufgelöste Fotos machen, das wäre machbar und sinnvoll aber es ist verboten. Innenstädte sind quasi verboten, eigentlich darf man nur "irgendwo in der Wildnis" weitab von Städten frei fliegen. --Ralf Roletschek 22:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Túrelio (talk) 19:34, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bist Du ein Bot? dann bist Du noch optimierbar ;-) --Markus (talk) 21:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please, be so kind and don`t use this wrong category: Category:Freizeit im Sattel, The correect catogory is: Freizeit im Sattel. Thanks! --Warburg1866 (talk) 21:35, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Das verstehe ich nicht. --Markus (talk) 21:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

2A02:810D:4ABF:CE84:6C34:5BE7:D199:A45 11:00, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

2A02:810D:4ABF:CE84:6C34:5BE7:D199:A45 11:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

2A02:810D:4ABF:CE84:6C34:5BE7:D199:A45 11:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

2A02:810D:4ABF:CE84:6C34:5BE7:D199:A45 11:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

2A02:810D:4ABF:CE84:6C34:5BE7:D199:A45 11:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 00:56, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Affected:

File:JOSM OpenSeaMap Attributes Kalamaki.jpg

Yours sincerely, 0x0a (talk) 13:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, wenn du der Ansicht bist der Name PARK(ing) Day sei falsch, kannst du die Umbenennung beantragen, aber Parallelkategorien zum gleichen Thema haben wir hier nicht. MfG --A.Savin 21:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ergänzend sei noch anzumerken, dass es natürlich überhaupt keinen Sinn macht, Kategorien anzulegen die in keine einzige andere Kategorie einsortiert sind. --A.Savin 21:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply