Line 29:
{{unblock| Per [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/WebEx_and_Min_Zhu | WebEx and Min_Zhu ArbCom case]] FeloniousMonk is admonished not to use his administrative tools or give warnings in content disputes in which he is involved. See my talk page for evidence of failure to follow that admonishment.}}
===Evidence===
FeloniousMonk was admonished in the [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/WebEx_and_Min_Zhu | WebEx and Min_Zhu arbcom case]] 'not to use his administrative tools or give warnings in content disputes in which he is involved.' This is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jonathan_Sarfati&diff=prev&oldid=111513865 evidence of recent involvement in a content dispute],] where FM reinserted a [[WP:BLP]]—[[WP:OR]]—[[WP:ATT]] violation (edit summary ''rv guettarda was correct'') without participation in talk). (Furthermore, he [[User_talk:FeloniousMonk#Overturned | continued this behaviour]] against another editor in an unrelated issue, which [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJimbo_Wales&diff=117655756&oldid=117655107 Wales said] 'was not warranted' and 'worthy of a bigger discussion'). He is also [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Agapetos_angel#Log_of_blocks_and_bans | blocking outside the scope of the arbcom decision]], even if one incorrectly asserts that I am party to it, including blocking ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Agapetos_angel&diff=prev&oldid=108876792 17 February 2007]) for [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jonathan_Sarfati%282%29&action=history contributing] to (not voting!) to a [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jonathan_Sarfati%282%29 | deletion discussion]] that was not an article, and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FAgapetos_angel&diff=115893581&oldid=114502933 removal of evidence] that showed he was acting inappropriately. He also made a previous block on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Agapetos_angel&diff=prev&oldid=64879321 20 July 2006], incorrectly citing the arbcom decision of 'associated articles', while first providing no evidence, then false evidence, to justify his accusation and inappropriate block. (Note that KillerChihuahua [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Agapetos_angel&diff=prev&oldid=101139074 removed evidence] from that page, claiming that it was posted by a banned user], while no one in that decision was banned from Wikipedia; therefore, the removal was inappropriate.) [[User:58.162.2.122|58.162.2.122]] 06:10, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
|