User talk:David Fraudly - Wikipedia
2 people in discussion
Welcome!
Hello, David Fraudly, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from National Film Award for Best Actress. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Island Monkey talk the talk 10:36, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
- It's better to merge all records into List of List of National Film Award records.--David Fraudly (talk) 10:42, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
- Oh...so that was what you were doing...go ahead then. Just remember next time when doing something like that to put an edit summary. Island Monkey talk the talk 10:46, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the request, but I would say not to go against any editor. The user you were mentioning is an Administrator on English Wikipedia. This discussion has created a lot of problems in the past and this time the article has been submitted for "Reassessment". If the discussion goes like this without reaching a consensus, the article will lose it's GA status for sure. So for now, we should think more about preserving the article's Good article status. --Commander (Ping Me) 02:43, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
- I agree, he may not have sufficient knowledge about Indian films. But if someone comes and revert your edits please don't edit war with them. It will result in a severe action. Anyway let's wait and see. --Commander (Ping Me) 05:18, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hi! looks like you have removed sourced content in Badrinath without any explanations. Please don't do so and don't revert any page more than three times a day. --Commander (Ping Me) 18:05, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
- It applies for all editors, right or wrong doesn't matter. I'd advise you not to fight against such people. Instead just ignore them. I didn't see his edits on the article history as I watch only editors who are experienced than myself and are really constructive. Commander (Ping Me) 18:33, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Fæ (talk) 15:22, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
I expected this unconstructive reaction. I'll relocate my energy to get the case filed.--David Fraudly (talk) 15:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
- You're also evading a block by socking, so there's that. TNXMan 15:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
- great achievement! I'm impressed! --David Fraudly (talk) 15:56, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply