User talk:Vordrak: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 104:

Actions taken by administrators under [[WP:AC/DS]] don't require consensus, only appeals which require clear consensus to overturn. Statements by editors are not meant to be votes, but instead are to provide context and evidence for enforcing admins. Also, the {{t|reply to}} template can take multiple users so you can combine multiple {{t|reply to}}s into on (e.g. <nowiki>{{reply to|Strongjam|Vordrak}}</nowiki>.) — [[User:Strongjam|Strongjam]] ([[User talk:Strongjam|talk]]) 12:42, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Vordrak}}, I was coming here to leave roughly the same message as {{u|Strongjam}}, above. They are entirely correct when they say that statements are "not votes"; for additional reading on this I suggest the ''essay'' [[Wikipedia:Polling_is_not_a_substitute_for_discussion|here]]. On the other concern, there is currently an active Arbitration Committee [[WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration_enforcement|case]] which, from my cursory reading, might in part address the question of WP:AC/DS sanctions applied at the discretion of an individual administrators and contemporaneous [[WP:AE]] consensus to not sanction. Hope this helps. - [[User:Ryk72|Ryk72]] ^{[[User talk:Ryk72|'c.s.n.s.']]} 12:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

::{{reply to|Strongjam|Ryk72}} thank you gentlemen. I shall amend my comments on AE. [[User:Vordrak|Vordrak]] ([[User talk:Vordrak#top|talk]]) 13:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)