Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 20:42, 20 March 2020 edit

Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors

135,636 edits

← Previous edit

Revision as of 00:00, 21 March 2020 edit undo

K.e.coffman

(talk | contribs)

Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers

98,333 edits

Next edit →

Line 767:

*: '''Yes'''. The information and the data looks probably correct to me. Also, the data represented for every country is being retrieved from the official governement websites of the respective countries and have specified links to those websites. I am not so sure about the day-wise timeline of the incidents but seems that it is also derived from the linked official government sources for respective countries. The data representation is easier to understand the overall impact of the spread of the novel coronavirus 2019 globally. [[User:Vishaltelangre|Vishal Telangre]] ([[User talk:Vishaltelangre|talk]]) 09:42, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

*: '''No'''. The company does not provide information about its editorial board and most articles are not bylined and/or transparently derivative [https://bnonews.com/index.php/2020/02/washington-state-officials-provide-update-on-coronavirus-cases/ is this a copyright violation]? For disease information especially, it is important to use a reliable source. [[User:Buidhe|b]][[User talk:Buidhe|uidh]][[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|e]] 19:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

:*'''Preferably, no''' per above. They also host a donation link so I don't think it's appropriate to link as a source while other websites provide same info. --[[User:K.e.coffman|K.e.coffman]] ([[User talk:K.e.coffman|talk]]) 00:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

== YouTube video and COVID-19==