Talk:Vaush - Wikipedia
3 people in discussion
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
considering adding this. it's unsourced and reads like a commercial
NotQualified (talk) 13:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- NotQualified ??? I'm pretty sure commercials don't describe its product as a "controversial figure" that's received "criticism for various statements." Just because it isn't as negative as his haters want doesn't mean it's promoting him in the slightest; read WP:NPOV and MOS:LEAD. I swear, it's as if people invent things to criticize just because they think words are free. PantheonRadiance (talk) 01:00, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- sorry i meant more the way it's phrased than the content itself. read this for example
- "Noted for his confrontational style, use of memes and mimicry from right-wing YouTubers, he is considered a notable figure within the BreadTube community. Described as a progressive and libertarian socialist"
- it just sounds, odd? also nothing in the lede is sourced.
- promotional tone is too harsh but it reads unusually, like it was AI generated NotQualified (talk) 01:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- See WP:LEADCITE:
the presence of citations in the lead is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article
. As long as everything in the lead is cited in the body of the article, it should be ok, feel free to point anything out if you think it isn't cited in the body anywhere. You should be able to edit the page - make some changes to try and fix any tone issues! You might be reverted but can come back here to discuss if you are. Or you can make any suggestions here if you don't want to directly edit the page. Shapeyness (talk) 09:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- See WP:LEADCITE: