User talk:78.68.210.173 - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
I detest opaqueness masquerading as civility. Frankness will get you the furthest with me.
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.  Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
Greetings, I have deleted your post at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. In order to open a case there, please click the button located under "Do you need assistance?" If you have a general question, you may ask it at WT:DRN. Cheers! DonIago (talk) 19:22, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
- Oki fixed.
Edit summaries such as "Dude, either you're a propagandist or I don't know what" are not appropriate. Please be more civil. The edit in question is: [1]. Thanks, JoeSperrazza (talk) 21:44, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
- I n my opinion it's the honest truth of my feelings so it is appropriate 78.68.210.173 (talk) 19:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
- Take my advice or not, but doing it again makes it certain you'll be reported to WP:ANI and possible you'll be blocked. Its OK to think what you want, but expressing such feelings here is not OK. JoeSperrazza (talk) 20:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
- Are you bloody deleting conversations on my own talkpage? 78.68.210.173 (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
- Re-adding the answer that was here before: I will not take your advice. I am currently the victim of far worse abuse at the hands of the user Iryna Harpy and you have little pitty for that it seems while me and Gloucester are not attacking each other and I was only presenting my opinion of him as I thought it and fully explained myself. I am in the process of writing a report about this user so feel free to write one about me too. 78.68.210.173 (talk) 20:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Are you bloody deleting conversations on my own talkpage? 78.68.210.173 (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
- Take my advice or not, but doing it again makes it certain you'll be reported to WP:ANI and possible you'll be blocked. Its OK to think what you want, but expressing such feelings here is not OK. JoeSperrazza (talk) 20:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Do not under any circumstances delete content on my own talk-page or it will be reported for abuse. Concerning my deletion of your template you are first to justify the need for it, see your PMs. 78.68.210.173 (talk) 21:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
- The template is a part of Wikipedia:Administration, and it is used to show that an IP may be used by multiple people. This affects the blocks done by admins (more), and therefore should not be removed. You have been shown WP:BLANKING & WP:DRC before, they exist for a reason. Also, it is by no means demanding that you create an account, it merely gives it as the alternative.
Consider this an official warning: Do not remove the shared IP notice from your talk page again. -- Orduin Discuss 22:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
- Template removed per template rules quote: "This template should be used on IPs which appear to be or are likely to be shared by multiple users - typically IPs assigned to large institutions, or to a pool of dynamic IP addresses. Where there is no indication of this, the template should not be used. "78.68.210.173 (talk) 22:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC) I demand to hear what indication you may have that the IP is shared, since that would be of security interest to me as it should not be shared. 78.68.210.173 (talk) 22:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
- I suggest you particularly pay attention to the purposes of Wikipedia and the developing consensus in the discussion you began at RS/N. Rhoark (talk) 00:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I'm Liz. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Iryna Harpy that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not use obscene language to another editor or resort to name calling ("fucking bitch"). Civility is expected of editors on Wikipedia no matter how heated the disagreements become. Liz Read! Talk! 16:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- Oh, I blocked you and only now I see the "fucking bitch" comment. Well well. IP, I don't know what you came here to do--well, I can guess--but it has by now devolved into trolling, personal attacks, forum shopping, and false allegations ("cabal"--if you only knew how ridiculous it is to put me in a cabal with RGloucester). In other words, there may have been something moderately legitimate below all this, but now it's just a timesink, that's all. Drmies (talk) 18:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
- Well, Drmies, I must be schizoid as I've established that I don't seem to be committed enough to the cabal I 'belong' to. Am I attached to the obvious 'pro-Western' cabal, or am I attached to the 'anti-Western' cabal? Considering the fact that I've 'collaborated' with editors such as Darouet, Al Khazar, Moscow Connection, Herzen, Ezhiki, SkoraPobeda, Leftcry and Jirka.h23 (+++), as well as having railed against the usual suspects constituting the inner sanctum purportedly POV-pushing Western press 'lies', I seem to be extremely confused as to whether I'm doing the right thing by 'colleagues'. Oh, well. It seems I need assistance with establishing which side I'm on. Do we have cabal meetings and support groups available? --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:08, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
If you don't like what someone has added to Wikipedia, don't talk try to convince them like you would a friend or a neighbour. This is an encyclopedia with a complex series of policies. Think of it like a court of law; cases are won not by being friendly and appealing to common sense, but by being thorough and doing your homework (the hard way). Nobody will help you or be on your side, unless you're quite lucky. Being neighbourly and casual doesn't actually help (nor the flip side of being nasty). Good luck. Esn (talk) 20:03, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Drmies, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.