User talk:GANIGHY - Wikipedia

1 person in discussion

Article Images

Hello, GANIGHY! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! @1997kB 05:01, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1997kB was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources 1-4 are the news reported by him, but to write an article on SUBJECT, sources should be on SUBJECT; his work is ir-relative here. Now sources 5-7 are talking about same story, that he received award and which is not enough to establish notability. To find out which type of sources are reliable see WP:RS, WP:IS and before picking up a source please check that they are on subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

when they have been resolved

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Gani (Indian Journalist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abdul Gani (Indian Journalist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

@1997kB 04:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

First newly added source is about a 'Abu Taher Ahmed' and the second is about a group of women called the 'Hargila Army', and the third is about a documentary – Soccer Queens of Rani. Where are the sources ABOUT the actual subject?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

when they have been resolved

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Gani (Indian Journalist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abdul Gani (Indian Journalist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 07:47, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SshibumXZ was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

when they have been resolved

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Gani (Indian Journalist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Abdul Gani (Indian Journalist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 19:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

when they have been resolved

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mothers of Manipur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mothers of Manipur, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 12:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

More accounts and passings of her career as an author/journalist needed instead of just accolades.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

when they have been resolved

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Teresa Rehman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Teresa Rehman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 12:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, GANIGHY, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SeytX (talk) 19:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This is a good start, and you have two good citations, but you need at least one or two more citations to news articles discussing Boro and his work and impact. Sources can be in any language, though English sources are preferred if available. Add a couple more citations to good sources, then click Resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

when they have been resolved

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Biju Boro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Biju Boro, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Davisonio was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

when they have been resolved

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Teresa Rehman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Teresa Rehman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Craig Davison (talk) 17:03, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, GANIGHY. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abdul Gani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 20:06, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, GANIGHY. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mothers of Manipur".

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 13:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, GANIGHY. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Biju Boro".

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 06:15, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Pradip Kurbah is a national award winning filmmaker based in northeast Indian state Meghalaya. ^[1] His is best known for his films Ri: Homeland of Uncertainty (2013) and Onaatah (2016) ^[2]. Both these films have won National Awards.

His third film Iewduh is going to be premiered at the 23rd Busan International Film Festival in October. ^[3] Iewduh is also known as Barabazar which is one of the oldest and largest traditional markets and trade centres in the whole of northeast, in Shillong. The film narrates the daily lives of the people involved with the market and their co-existence with different religions and communities. ^[4]

His Onaatah has also been made into Marathi language -- Mann Udhan Vaara -- by renowned name of Indian film industry Satish Kaushik and Sanjay Memane. It’s all set to release on October 11, 2019. This is second film from Northeast India to be remade in other Indian languages. Assamese film Chameli Memsaab (1975) by Dr Bhupen Hazarika was made in Hindi and Bengali. ^[5] ^[6]

Iewduh will also be screened at the Mumbai International Film Festival in Mumbai which starts from October 17. ^[7]

Teresa Rehman is an award winning Indian journalist and author. Rehman is based in the northeastern Indian city Guwahati. She has extensively covered the region for several national news outlets including India Today, The Telegraph and Tehelka. ^[8] ^[9]

She is best known for her extensive coverage of insurgency in the northeast states and also the violation of human rights. Her story on the killing of Chungkham Sanjit, a former militant by police in Manipur which appeared in Tehelka magazine was widely discussed across the country. ^[10] Her book Mothers of Manipur narrates the story of 12 extraordinary women who stripped themselves naked to protest the killing of Thangjam Manorama, a 32-year-old woman suspected of being a militant, by Indian Army, in Imphal in 2004. The book was published by Zubaan books. ^[11]

Her second book, Bullet Proof, published by Penguin, chronicles her journey as a conflict reporter in the trouble-torn area for two decades. The publisher Penguin says that going beyond mere statistics, of deaths and arms recovered, and other documentary evidence, the book shows how conflict impacts women, children, health, environment, sanitation, wildlife and society. This book is a collection of rare human stories from one of the most under-reported regions in the world. ^[12]

Reviewer Sudipta Datta says for two decades, Teresa Rehman tried to make sense of this large troubled zone which has witnessed “bloodbaths, unrest and violence. “There were many firsts in her assignments which included chasing ULFA (United Liberation Front of Assam) leaders inside a government hospital when they came for checkups; grabbing an interview with one of its top leaders as he appeared in court; meeting a sniper, a senior member of the National Democratic Front of Bodoland,” Datta writes. ^[13]

Hello, GANIGHY. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abdul Gani (journalist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, GANIGHY. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abdul Gani".

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 20:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Draft:Abdul Gani (journalist). Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 14:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Rekib Ahmed, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 04:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Sulakshana Mithi Kachari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable bureaucrat. Fails WP:ANYBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cabrils (talk) 07:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Parthib Gogoi.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Toshen Bora football.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply