Sorry that you are no longer active on Wiki as an editor but completely understand. I am having similar experiences as you with the same editors too. The same admin group appears to be tightly involved in any Hinduism relaged pages. You can see this on my talk page on edits related to Rigveda, Talwade and p v vartak controversy. There appears to hardly any neutral POV and just like in your experience perfectly reliable sources are arbitrarily rejected and flimsy ones are accepted that suit their narrative. However this experience has only made me more motivated to work outside wiki with other organizations to fight what appears to be some serious POV pushing. I would encourage you to do the same. ga11 (talk) 22:35, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
I agree with your edits to Hindu Kush but think that you should explain yourself on the talk page of the article. I previously tried to do that too.[1] --1990'sguy (talk) 00:51, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply