1910 California gubernatorial election: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia


Article Images

Line 12:

| next_year = 1914

| election_date = {{Start date|1910|11|8}}

<!-- Hiram Johnson -->| image1 = PortraitSouvenir of Hiramthe Johnsonunveiling, dedication and presentation of the Abraham Lincoln G. A. R. memorial monument - dedicated to the veterans of the Civil War, 1861-1865, at Long Beach, California, July 3rd, (14576262447).jpg

| nominee1 = '''[[Hiram Johnson]]'''

| party1 = Republican Party (United States)

| popular_vote1 = '''177,191'''

| percentage1 = '''45.994%'''

<!-- Theodore Arlington Bell -->| image2 = Theodore A. Bell LCCN2014693255 (cropped 2).jpg

Line 22:

| party2 = Democratic Party (United States)

| popular_vote2 = 154,835

| percentage2 = 40.114%

<!-- J. Stitt Wilson -->| image3 = File:J. Stitt Wilson circa 1916.jpg

Line 28:

| party3 = Socialist Party of America

| popular_vote3 = 47,819

| percentage3 = 12.440%

| map_image = 1910 California gubernatorial election results map by county.svg

| map_size = x250px

Line 39:

}}

{{ElectionsCA}}

The '''1910 California gubernatorial election''' was held on November 8, 1910. It saw [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] [[Hiram Johnson]] elected as the state's governor. Johnson won the election with 45.9% of the popular vote, and became the 23rd governor of California. This was the first gubernatorial election in which [[Fresno County, California|Fresno County]], [[Modoc County, California|Modoc County]], [[San Benito County, California|San Benito County]], [[Stanislaus County, California|Stanislaus County]], and [[Tulare County, California|Tulare County]] voted for a Republican candidate. These Republican flips of traditionally (at the time) Democratic counties foreshadowed the future Republican dominance of California gubernatorial elections that began in the [[1914 California gubernatorial election|next election]].

==Background==

The governor of California at the time of this election was Republican [[James Gillett]]. Gillett's nomination to top of the Republican ticket was controversial in 1906, and during the previous campaign he was consistently accused of being in the pocket of the [[Southern Pacific Railroad]]. Despite this, he served a term as governor and accomplished several things, including being a leader in the creation of the state's highway system, and developing parole guidelines for prisoners.<ref>{{cite web |title=James Gillett |url=https://governors.library.ca.gov/22-Gillett.html |website=The Governors Gallery |publisher=California State Library |access-date=17 May 2024}}</ref> Despite this he was suffering financially while being governor, and decided not to seek a second term. He instead opted to pursue a career in law.<ref>{{cite web |title=Gov. James Norris Gillett |url=https://www.nga.org/governor/james-norris-gillett/ |website=National Governors Association |access-date=17 May 2024}}</ref>

==Democratic primary==

The three main candidates for the Democratic nomination were former runner up and congressman [[Theodore Arlington Bell]], former congressman [[Thomas J. Geary]], and State Senator John B. Sanford.<ref>{{cite news |title=The Gubernatorial Whirlpool |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=NN19100302.2.29 |access-date=2 June 2024 |publisher=Newcastle News |date=2 March 1910}}</ref> On March 10, 1910 Theodore Bell announced his candidacy for governor in [[San Francisco]]. Bell also announced that he was running on an anti-railroad platform.<ref>{{cite news |title=BELL FORMALLY ANNOUNCES HIS CANDIDACY FOR GOVERNOR |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=LAH19100311.2.38 |access-date=24 August 2024 |publisher=Los Angeles Herald |date=11 March 1910}}</ref> On May 28,1910, Bell visited the town of [[Hanford, California]], where he was interviewed by a reporter. In the interview he blamed the [[Independence Party (United States)|Independence Party]] and William Langdon for splitting the Democratic vote in his loss of the [[1906 California gubernatorial election]]. He also stated he did not believe that anyone would seriously challenge him for the Democratic nomination.<ref>{{cite news |title=Theodore Bell Here – Interviewed About His Candidacy — Was Here on Legal Business. |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=HS19100602.2.21 |access-date=27 July 2024 |publisher=Hanford Sentinel |date=2 June 1910}}</ref> Bell was proven correct when it was reported that the California Democratic Committee was not seeing any contests for the major state nominations.<ref>{{cite news |title=Democratic Candidates – State Central Committee Will Circulate Petitions |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=UDS19100604.2.32 |access-date=27 July 2024 |publisher=Union Democrat |date=4 June 1910}}</ref> On August 16, 1910 both the Democratic and Republican parties held their conventions. Bell was nominated for governor of California, and Timothy Spellacy as lieutenant governor.<ref>{{cite news |title=Insurgents Win Overwhelmingly; Down Old Guard |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=LAH19100817.2.16 |access-date=27 July 2024 |publisher=Los Angeles Herald |date=17 August 1910}}</ref>

==Republican primary==

For the entire month of January in 1910, it was not clear that Governor [[James Gillett]] would seek renomination, but his intentions were made clear on January 30, when he announced through a published letter to the [[California Republican Party]], that he would not seek the nomination because, "It is for the best interest of myself and family that I should again resume the practice of my profession, and I can not well afford to continue in the office of governor for another, period of four years."<ref>{{cite news |title=GILLETTGillett NOTNot Aa CANDIDATECandidate FORfor Aa SECONDSecond TERMTerm |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=SFC19100130.2.3 |access-date=30 May 2024 |publisher=San Francisco Call |date=30 January 1910}}</ref>

After Gillett's announcement there were multiple candidates willing to contend for the Republican nomination. The most prominent of these men were [[Charles F. Curry]] the secretary of state for California, and an early favorite in the race. Curry was so confident in himself, that he even called the primary election and governorship for himself on the day that Gillett's announcement was made.<ref>{{cite news |title=CURRYCurry THINKSThinks HISHis NOMINATIONNomination ANDand ELECTIONElection AREAre NOWNow CERTAINCertain |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=SFC19100130.2.20 |access-date=30 May 2024 |publisher=San Francisco Call |date=30 January 1910}}</ref> In addition to Curry, [[Frank K. Mott]], the mayor of Oakland, and [[Francis J. Heney]] a prosecutor and former attorney general in Arizona were all considering runs. [[Hiram Johnson]], [[Chester Rowell]], and William R. Davis all announced that they were not seeking the nomination.<ref>{{cite news |title=GOVERNORGovernor'Ss LETTERLetter STARTSStarts HOTHot RACERace FORfor NOMINATIONNomination |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=MFP19100131.2.5 |access-date=30 May 2024 |publisher=Ventura Free Press |date=31 January 1910}}</ref>

The [[Lincoln-Roosevelt League]], a faction representing progressive elements of the Republican Party struggled to nominate a candidate for office. The league initially tried to force Hiram Johnson to accept the nomination, but he turned it down. The league was then split on either nominating [[Charles M. Belshaw]], and William Rude Davis, a former mayor of Oakland.<ref>{{cite news |title=LEAGUELeague FAILSFails TOto AGREEAgree ONon Aa CANDIDATECandidate |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=SFC19100208.2.3 |access-date=30 May 2024 |publisher=San Francisco Call |date=8 February 1910}}</ref> In early February, it was reported that Frank K. Mott and Charles Belshaw were the only candidates that the league were considering for governor, and that the League was still split between its two factions, in regards to who between should receive the league's blessing.<ref>{{cite news |title=TROUBLETrouble INin THEthe League LEAGUE Much Mystery and Lack of Harmony in the Camp of the Lincoln-Roosevelt Reformers |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=SDDU19100219.2.53 |access-date=31 May 2024 |publisher=San Diego Union and Daily Bee |date=19 February 1910}}</ref> On February 20, it was announced that despite turning down the nomination multiple times, [[Hiram Johnson]] would run under the banner of the Lincoln-Roosevelt League.<ref>{{cite news |title=JOHNSONJohnson AGREESAgrees TOto LEADLead BATTLEBattle OFof THEthe LEAGUELeague |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=SFC19100220.2.29 |access-date=31 May 2024 |publisher=San Francisco Call |date=20 February 1910}}</ref> In his announcement he stated <blockquote>"It seems to be my turn to make the sacrifice and I am going to make it. For two months the utmost pressure has been brought to bear upon me. I had steadfastly refused to become a candidate, but it was placed before me in such a fashion that I was forced to fail in my duty or accept. So I am going ahead, making the fight as a progressive republican on the Roosevelt Lines. I am going to make this fight an endeavor to return the government of California, to the people and take it away from the political bureau of the [[Southern Pacific Railroad|Southern Pacific railway company]]. If nothing else can be accomplished, we can teach the people the lesson talked by our last president and that is being talked today to the people of the United States by [[Robert M. La Follette|La Follette]]."<ref>{{cite news |title=FIGHTFight TOto RESCUERescue STATEState |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=SFC19100220.2.31.1 |access-date=31 May 2024 |publisher=San Francisco Call |date=20 February 1910}}</ref></blockquote>

Shortly after Johnson's announcement, former governor [[George Pardee]] and member of the Lincoln-Roosevelt League supported Hiram Johnson for the governorship.<ref>{{cite news |title=PARDEEPardee FAVORSFavors HIRAMHiram JOHNSONJohnson FORfor GOVERNORGovernor |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=LAH19100222.2.93 |access-date=31 May 2024 |publisher=Los Angeles Herald |date=22 February 1910}}</ref> Hiram Johnson began making plans for his tour of the state in late February, stating that he would visit every part of California, even those areas that had less population.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Van Smith |first1=George A. |title=Johnson Outlines Sizzling Campaign |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=SFC19100301.2.115 |access-date=3 August 2024 |publisher=San Francisco Call |date=1 March 1910}}</ref> Hiram Johnson launched his campaign in Southern California, where he visited cities such as [[Long Beach]] and [[Los Angeles]]. He inspected the Harbor of Los Angeles and gave an informal reception in the city.<ref>{{cite news |title=JOHNSON FLAYS BOARD; SAYS TAX BURDEN OUTRAGE |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=LAH19100312.2.14 |access-date=24 August 2024 |publisher=Los Angeles Herald |date=12 March 1910}}</ref>

[[Albert Joseph Wallace]] was chosen to be Hiram Johnson's running mate. Wallace was previously the Chairman of the Finance Committee for Los Angeles City Council.<ref>{{cite news |title=JOHNSON OPENS HIS GUBERNATORIAL CAMPAIGN 452 HEAR CANDIDATES SPEAK AT THE GARRICK URGES FOLLOWERS TO FIGHT LIKE SOLDIERS DOWN WITH BOSSES, SLOGAN OF NEW PARTY LEADER Appeals to San Diegans to Lift Yoke and Gain Owner-ship of Harbor Confident of Victory, Will Tour Entire State by Means of Automobile. |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=SDDU19100315.2.53 |access-date=9 September 2024 |publisher=San Diego Union and Daily Bee |date=15 March 1910}}</ref>

The non reform faction of the Republican party was vastly unpopular, as the Lincoln-Roosevelt League represented a change to the status quo. [[Charles F. Curry|Charles Curry]], [[Alden Anderson]], and [[Phillip A. Stanton]], the three leading non-reformist candidates struggled to gain momentum against Hiram Johnson, who was becoming popular across the state.<ref>{{cite news |title=MACHINE REGULARS ARE FACING CRISIS |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=LAH19100320.2.3 |access-date=14 September 2024 |publisher=Los Angeles Herald |date=20 March 1910}}</ref> On March 20, 1910 the [[Asiatic Exclusion League]] invited candidates to speak their minds on the "Japanese Question" (the removal of Japanese immigrants from California). Candidates from both parties responded, with Theodore Bell, Frank McGowen, and Charles F. Curry, making an appearance. Alden Anderson sent condolences that he couldn't appear, and Hiram Johnson ignored the invitation. All the candidates at the conference except Bell, made strong declarations that they would "Fight with the league".<ref>{{cite news |title=CANDIDATE SPEAK TO THE EXCLUSION LEAGUE- Alden Anderson Sends Regrets, and Stanton and Johnson Ignore the Invitation - Santa Clara Orchardists Plan to Change Time of Vacation. |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=SJMN19100322.2.49 |access-date=14 September 2024 |publisher=San Jose Mercury-news |date=22 March 1910}}</ref>

==Third Party Campaigns==

Simone P. Meads was nominated by the [[Prohibition Party]] for governor in September of 1910 at the party's convention in [[San Jose, California]]<ref>{{cite news |title=STATEState Prohibitionists PROHIBITIONISTSClose CLOSETheir THEIRConvention CONVENTION Platform Is Adopted, Campaign Is Planned and State Committee Organizes. Loyalty to National Party and Principles Declared in Resolutions. |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=SJMN19100909.2.62 |access-date=17 May 2024 |publisher=San Jose Mercury-news |date=9 September 1910}}</ref> Meads was a public school teacher and principal for multiple schools in [[Oakland]]. In addition to being a teacher, Meads was also a published author, writing several books about life in Oakland, and educational teaching materials.<ref>{{cite webnews |title=Simeon P. Meads, obituaryPioneer Oakland Educator, Dies |url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/oakland-tribune-simeon-p-meads-obituary/79700527/ |website=Newspapers.com |access-date=172 MayJune 2024 |publisher=Oakland Tribune |date=October 2, 1940}}</ref> In addition to the prohibition of alcohol, the party also supported the public ownership of utilities, women's suffrage, and the implementation of [[Initiatives and referendums in the United States|referendum, reform, and recall ballot measures]].<ref>{{cite news |title=PROHIBITIONProhibition PARTYParty HASHas ADOPTEDAdopted A GOODGood PLATFORMPlatform (By|agency=The Associated Press) |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=FHD19100908.2.13 |access-date=17 May 2024 |publisher=Fresno Evening Herald |date=8 September 1910}}</ref>

[[Jackson Stitt Wilson]] was an avid [[christianChristian socialist]] who was a delegate to conventions of the [[Socialist Party of America|Socialist Party]] in 1904 and 1910. California's Socialist Party nominated him for governor at their convention, and he received word of their choice by [[telegram]]. He began his campaign in [[Los Angeles]], and would travel the state in a red colored automobile nicknamed the "Red Special".<ref>{{cite news |title=SOCIALISTSocialist CANDIDATECandidate TOto CAMPAIGNCampaign INin REDRed AUTOAuto |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=LAH19100530.2.6 |access-date=17 May 2024 |publisher=Los Angeles Herald |date=30 May 1910}}</ref> The name of Wilson's automobile was a direct reference to Eugene Debs' train that he traveled on during the [[1908 United States presidential election|1908 Presidential Election]], also known as the "Red Special".<ref>{{cite web |title=Eugene V. Debs looking out window of the "Red Special" train, 1908 |url=https://indstate.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/isulib/id/8769/ |publisher=Indiana State University Library |access-date=17 May 2024}}</ref> Wilson was widely regarded as a famous orator, and in beginning of his campaign he challenged other candidates in the race to debate him. To assist the campaign, [[Eugene Debs]] visited the state and campaigned for the benefit of Wilson over a period of two weeks.<ref>{{cite news |title=Wilson Will Have a Say In This City Socialist Candidate tor Governor is Preparing for a Vigorous Campaign |url=https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=SLODT19100628.2.32 |access-date=17 May 2024 |publisher=San Luis Obispo Daily Telegram |date=28 June 1910}}</ref>

==General election results==

{{Election box begin | title=1910 gubernatorial election, California<ref name="results">{{cite book |title=Statement of the Vote of California at the General Election, Held November 8, 1910|author=California Secretary of State|publisher=State Printing Office|location=Sacramento, California |pages=2 |url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.31970020666662&view=1up&seq=8 |access-date=18 July 2024}}</ref>

{{Election box begin | title=1910 gubernatorial election, California}}

}}

{{Election box winning candidate with party link|

|party = Republican Party (United States)

Line 66 ⟶ 72:

|votes = 177,191

|percentage = 45.94%

|change = +5.5859%

}}

{{Election box candidate with party link|

|party = Democratic Party (United States)

|candidate = [[Theodore Arlington Bell]]

|votes = 154,835

|percentage = 40.14%

|change = +2.43%

}}

{{Election box candidate with party link|

|party = Socialist Party of America

|candidate = [[J. Stitt Wilson]]

|votes = 47,819

|percentage = 12.40%

|change = +7.26%

}}

{{Election box candidate with party link|

|party = Prohibition Party (United States)

|candidate = Simeon P. Meads

|votes = 5,807

|percentage = 1.51%

|change = -0.85%

}}

{{Election box candidate |

|party =

|candidate = Scattering

|votes = 61

|percentage = 0.02%

|change =

}}

{{Election box majority|

| votes = 22,356

| percentage = 5.80%

| change =

}}

{{Election box candidate with party link||party=Democratic Party (United States)|candidate=[[Theodore Arlington Bell]]|votes=154,835|percentage=40.14%|change=+2.42%}}

{{Election box candidate with party link||party=Socialist Party of America|candidate=[[J. Stitt Wilson]]|votes=47,819|percentage=12.40%|change=+7.26%}}

{{Election box candidate with party link||party=Prohibition Party (United States)|candidate=[[Simeon P. Meads]]|votes=5,807|percentage=1.51%|change=-0.85%}}

{{Election box total|

|votes = 385,652713

|percentage = 100.000%

|change =

}}

{{Election box hold with party link|

|winner = Republican Party (United States)

|swing = +3.15%

}}

{{Election box end}}

===Results by county===

{|class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"

|-

! rowspan="2" |County

! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Hiram W. Johnson<br />Republican

! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Theodore A. Bell<br />Democratic

! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| J. Stitt Wilson<br />Socialist

! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Simeon P. Meads<br />Prohibition

! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Scattering<br />Write-in

! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Margin

! style="text-align:center;" rowspan="2"| Total votes cast<ref name="results"/>

|-

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| #

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| %

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| #

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| %

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| #

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| %

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| #

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| %

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| #

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| %

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| #

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| %

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Alameda County, California|Alameda]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|15,826

| {{party shading/Republican}}|49.46%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|9,821

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|30.69%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|5,743

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|17.95%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|610

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1.91%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|6,005

| {{party shading/Republican}}|18.77%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|32,000

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Alpine County, California|Alpine]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|65

| {{party shading/Republican}}|87.84%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|9

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|12.16%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|0

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|56

| {{party shading/Republican}}|75.68%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|74

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Amador County, California|Amador]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,000

| {{party shading/Republican}}|46.64%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,100

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|51.31%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|40

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|1.87%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|4

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.19%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-100

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-4.66%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|2,144

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Butte County, California|Butte]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|2,692

| {{party shading/Republican}}|46.17%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|2,507

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|43.00%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|549

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|9.42%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|78

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1.34%

| {{party shading/None}}|4

| {{party shading/None}}|0.07%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|185

| {{party shading/Republican}}|3.17%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|5,830

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Calaveras County, California|Calaveras]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,037

| {{party shading/Republican}}|43.74%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,127

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|47.53%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|187

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|7.89%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|20

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.84%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-90

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-3.80%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|2,371

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Colusa County, California|Colusa]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|649

| {{party shading/Republican}}|32.53%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,313

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|65.81%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|27

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|1.35%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|6

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.30%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-664

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-33.28%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,995

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Contra Costa County, California|Contra Costa]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|2,603

| {{party shading/Republican}}|46.45%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|2,319

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|41.38%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|639

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|11.40%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|43

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.77%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|284

| {{party shading/Republican}}|5.07%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|5,604

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Del Norte County, California|Del Norte]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|390

| {{party shading/Republican}}|51.18%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|316

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|41.47%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|49

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|6.43%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|7

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.92%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|74

| {{party shading/Republican}}|9.71%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|762

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[El Dorado County, California|El Dorado]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|810

| {{party shading/Republican}}|40.72%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,072

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|53.90%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|102

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|5.13%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|5

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.25%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-262

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-13.17%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,989

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Fresno County, California|Fresno]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|6,200

| {{party shading/Republican}}|47.54%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|5,455

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|41.83%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|1,185

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|9.09%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|201

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1.54%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|745

| {{party shading/Republican}}|5.71%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|13,041

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Glenn County, California|Glenn]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|585

| {{party shading/Republican}}|36.86%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|955

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|60.18%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|35

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|2.21%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|12

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.76%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-370

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-23.31%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,587

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Humboldt County, California|Humboldt]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|3,050

| {{party shading/Republican}}|49.89%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,688

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|27.61%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|1,324

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|21.66%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|47

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.77%

| {{party shading/None}}|4

| {{party shading/None}}|0.07%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,362

| {{party shading/Republican}}|22.28%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|6,113

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Imperial County, California|Imperial]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,106

| {{party shading/Republican}}|47.55%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|801

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|34.44%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|366

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|15.74%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|53

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|2.28%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|305

| {{party shading/Republican}}|13.11%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|2,326

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Inyo County, California|Inyo]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|582

| {{party shading/Republican}}|41.51%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|634

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|45.22%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|157

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|11.20%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|29

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|2.07%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-52

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-3.71%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,402

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Kern County, California|Kern]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|2,680

| {{party shading/Republican}}|40.19%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|3,410

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|51.13%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|548

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|8.22%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|31

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.46%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-730

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-10.95%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|6,669

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Kings County, California|Kings]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,500

| {{party shading/Republican}}|50.05%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,149

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|38.34%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|305

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|10.18%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|43

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1.43%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|351

| {{party shading/Republican}}|11.71%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|2,997

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Lake County, California|Lake]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|570

| {{party shading/Republican}}|39.97%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|744

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|52.17%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|83

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|5.82%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|29

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|2.03%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-174

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-12.20%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,426

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Lassen County, California|Lassen]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|622

| {{party shading/Republican}}|54.04%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|437

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|37.97%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|87

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|7.56%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|5

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.43%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|185

| {{party shading/Republican}}|16.07%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,151

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Los Angeles County, California|Los Angeles]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|30,513

| {{party shading/Republican}}|45.78%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|23,051

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|34.58%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|11,129

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|16.70%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1,929

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|2.89%

| {{party shading/None}}|34

| {{party shading/None}}|0.05%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|7,462

| {{party shading/Republican}}|11.19%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|66,656

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Madera County, California|Madera]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|750

| {{party shading/Republican}}|44.75%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|777

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|46.36%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|140

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|8.35%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|9

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.54%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-27

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-1.61%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,676

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Marin County, California|Marin]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,955

| {{party shading/Republican}}|46.60%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,897

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|45.22%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|335

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|7.99%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|8

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.19%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|58

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1.38%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|4,195

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Mariposa County, California|Mariposa]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|403

| {{party shading/Republican}}|39.78%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|562

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|55.48%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|41

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|4.05%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|7

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.69%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-159

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-15.70%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,013

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Mendocino County, California|Mendocino]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|2,119

| {{party shading/Republican}}|44.63%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|2,259

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|47.58%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|338

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|7.12%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|32

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.67%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-140

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-2.95%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|4,748

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Merced County, California|Merced]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,212

| {{party shading/Republican}}|43.29%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,311

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|46.82%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|217

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|7.75%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|59

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|2.11%

| {{party shading/None}}|1

| {{party shading/None}}|0.04%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-99

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-3.54%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|2,800

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Modoc County, California|Modoc]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|635

| {{party shading/Republican}}|50.56%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|590

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|46.97%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|25

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|1.99%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|6

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.48%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|45

| {{party shading/Republican}}|3.58%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,256

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Mono County, California|Mono]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|230

| {{party shading/Republican}}|55.29%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|156

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|37.50%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|28

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|6.73%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.24%

| {{party shading/None}}|1

| {{party shading/None}}|0.24%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|74

| {{party shading/Republican}}|17.79%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|416

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Monterey County, California|Monterey]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|2,580

| {{party shading/Republican}}|55.16%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,839

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|39.32%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|159

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|3.40%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|98

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|2.10%

| {{party shading/None}}|1

| {{party shading/None}}|0.02%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|741

| {{party shading/Republican}}|15.84%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|4,677

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Napa County, California|Napa]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,629

| {{party shading/Republican}}|38.46%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|2,372

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|56.00%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|212

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|5.00%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|23

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.54%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-743

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-17.54%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|4,236

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Nevada County, California|Nevada]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,398

| {{party shading/Republican}}|43.20%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,290

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|39.86%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|531

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|16.41%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|17

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.53%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|108

| {{party shading/Republican}}|3.34%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|3,236

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Orange County, California|Orange]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|3,026

| {{party shading/Republican}}|46.94%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|2,695

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|41.80%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|467

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|7.24%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|259

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|4.02%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|331

| {{party shading/Republican}}|5.13%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|6,447

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Placer County, California|Placer]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,560

| {{party shading/Republican}}|46.06%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,603

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|47.33%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|187

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|5.52%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|36

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1.06%

| {{party shading/None}}|1

| {{party shading/None}}|0.03%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-43

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-1.27%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|3,387

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Plumas County, California|Plumas]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|622

| {{party shading/Republican}}|56.04%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|423

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|38.11%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|61

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|5.50%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|4

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.36%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|199

| {{party shading/Republican}}|17.93%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,110

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Riverside County, California|Riverside]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|3,026

| {{party shading/Republican}}|51.64%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,914

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|32.66%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|690

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|11.77%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|228

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|3.89%

| {{party shading/None}}|2

| {{party shading/None}}|0.03%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,112

| {{party shading/Republican}}|18.98%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|5,860

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Sacramento County, California|Sacramento]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|5,217

| {{party shading/Republican}}|42.44%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|6,033

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|49.08%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|994

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|8.09%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|49

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.40%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-816

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-6.64%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|12,293

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[San Benito County, California|San Benito]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|915

| {{party shading/Republican}}|48.59%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|874

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|46.42%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|74

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|3.93%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|20

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1.06%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|41

| {{party shading/Republican}}|2.18%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,883

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[San Bernardino County, California|San Bernardino]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|4,111

| {{party shading/Republican}}|45.06%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|3,611

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|39.58%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|1,025

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|11.23%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|377

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|4.13%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|500

| {{party shading/Republican}}|5.48%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|9,124

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[San Diego County, California|San Diego]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|4,514

| {{party shading/Republican}}|47.62%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|2,966

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|31.29%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|1,870

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|19.73%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|129

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1.36%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,548

| {{party shading/Republican}}|16.33%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|9,479

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[San Francisco, California|San Francisco]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|25,528

| {{party shading/Republican}}|43.13%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|24,065

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|40.66%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|9,476

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|16.01%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|113

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.19%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,463

| {{party shading/Republican}}|2.47%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|59,182

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[San Joaquin County, California|San Joaquin]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|3,969

| {{party shading/Republican}}|45.32%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|3,851

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|43.98%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|851

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|9.72%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|86

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.98%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|118

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1.35%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|8,757

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[San Luis Obispo County, California|San Luis Obispo]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|2,121

| {{party shading/Republican}}|50.95%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,285

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|30.87%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|726

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|17.44%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|31

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.74%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|836

| {{party shading/Republican}}|20.08%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|4,163

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[San Mateo County, California|San Mateo]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|2,389

| {{party shading/Republican}}|49.42%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,828

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|37.82%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|599

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|12.39%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|17

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.35%

| {{party shading/None}}|1

| {{party shading/None}}|0.02%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|561

| {{party shading/Republican}}|11.61%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|4,834

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Santa Barbara County, California|Santa Barbara]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|2,334

| {{party shading/Republican}}|49.24%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,995

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|42.09%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|366

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|7.72%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|43

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.91%

| {{party shading/None}}|2

| {{party shading/None}}|0.04%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|339

| {{party shading/Republican}}|7.15%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|4,740

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Santa Clara County, California|Santa Clara]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|7,078

| {{party shading/Republican}}|49.66%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|5,416

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|38.00%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|1,513

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|10.62%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|240

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1.68%

| {{party shading/None}}|5

| {{party shading/None}}|0.04%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,662

| {{party shading/Republican}}|11.66%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|14,252

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Santa Cruz County, California|Santa Cruz]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|2,508

| {{party shading/Republican}}|54.63%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,706

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|37.16%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|291

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|6.34%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|86

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1.87%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|802

| {{party shading/Republican}}|17.47%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|4,591

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Shasta County, California|Shasta]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,723

| {{party shading/Republican}}|46.02%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,606

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|42.90%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|398

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|10.63%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|16

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.43%

| {{party shading/None}}|1

| {{party shading/None}}|0.03%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|117

| {{party shading/Republican}}|3.13%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|3,744

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Sierra County, California|Sierra]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|542

| {{party shading/Republican}}|55.53%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|385

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|39.45%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|47

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|4.82%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|2

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.20%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|157

| {{party shading/Republican}}|16.09%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|976

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Siskiyou County, California|Siskiyou]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,630

| {{party shading/Republican}}|42.78%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,910

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|50.13%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|251

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|6.59%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|19

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.50%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-280

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-7.35%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|3,810

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Solano County, California|Solano]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|2,301

| {{party shading/Republican}}|39.13%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|2,919

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|49.63%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|611

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|10.39%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|50

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.85%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-618

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-10.51%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|5,881

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Sonoma County, California|Sonoma]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|3,976

| {{party shading/Republican}}|43.66%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|4,178

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|45.88%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|876

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|9.62%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|76

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.83%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-202

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-2.22%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|9,106

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Stanislaus County, California|Stanislaus]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,992

| {{party shading/Republican}}|45.14%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,798

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|40.74%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|324

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|7.34%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|297

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|6.73%

| {{party shading/None}}|2

| {{party shading/None}}|0.05%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|194

| {{party shading/Republican}}|4.40%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|4,413

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Sutter County, California|Sutter]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|845

| {{party shading/Republican}}|51.68%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|746

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|45.63%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|32

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|1.96%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|12

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.73%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|99

| {{party shading/Republican}}|6.06%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,635

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Tehama County, California|Tehama]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,094

| {{party shading/Republican}}|43.48%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,184

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|47.06%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|211

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|8.39%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|27

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1.07%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-90

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-3.58%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|2,516

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Trinity County, California|Trinity]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|484

| {{party shading/Republican}}|49.74%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|388

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|39.88%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|100

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|10.28%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/None}}|1

| {{party shading/None}}|0.10%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|96

| {{party shading/Republican}}|9.87%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|973

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Tulare County, California|Tulare]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|3,113

| {{party shading/Republican}}|46.92%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|2,877

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|43.36%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|574

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|8.65%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|71

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1.07%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|236

| {{party shading/Republican}}|3.56%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|6,635

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Tuolumne County, California|Tuolumne]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,080

| {{party shading/Republican}}|44.72%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,179

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|48.82%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|136

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|5.63%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|20

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.83%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-99

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-4.10%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|2,415

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}|[[Ventura County, California|Ventura]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,696

| {{party shading/Republican}}|48.82%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,545

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|44.47%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|192

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|5.53%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|41

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1.18%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|151

| {{party shading/Republican}}|4.35%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|3,474

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Yolo County, California|Yolo]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|1,466

| {{party shading/Republican}}|41.40%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,804

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|50.95%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|233

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|6.58%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|38

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|1.07%

| {{party shading/None}}|0

| {{party shading/None}}|0.00%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-338

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-9.55%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|3,541

|- style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|[[Yuba County, California|Yuba]]

| {{party shading/Republican}}|940

| {{party shading/Republican}}|44.72%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|1,090

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|51.86%

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|63

| {{party shading/Socialist}}|3.00%

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|8

| {{party shading/Prohibition}}|0.38%

| {{party shading/None}}|1

| {{party shading/None}}|0.05%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-150

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|-7.14%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|2,102

|- style="text-align:center;"

!Total!!177,191!!45.94%!!154,835!!40.14%!!47,819!!12.40%!!5,807!!1.51%!!61!!0.02%!!22,356!!5.80%!!385,713

|}

==== Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican ====

* [[Butte County, California|Butte]]

* [[Fresno County, California|Fresno]]

* [[Lassen County, California|Lassen]]

* [[Modoc County, California|Modoc]]

* [[Nevada County, California|Nevada]]

* [[Plumas County, California|Plumas]]

* [[San Benito County, California|San Benito]]

* [[San Joaquin County, California|San Joaquin]]

* [[San Luis Obispo County, California|Luis Obispo]]

* [[Santa Cruz County, California|Santa Cruz]]

* [[Shasta County, California|Shasta]]

* [[Sierra County, California|Sierra]]

* [[Stanislaus County, California|Stanislaus]]

* [[Sutter County, California|Sutter]]

* [[Tulare County, California|Tulare]]

==== Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic ====

* [[Calaveras County, California|Calaveras]]

* [[Mendocino County, California|Mendocino]]

==== Counties that flipped from Independence to Democratic ====

* [[Inyo County, California|Inyo]]

==References==

Line 94 ⟶ 1,050:

[[Category:California gubernatorial elections|1910]]

[[Category:1910 California elections|Gubernatorial]]

[[Category:November 1910 events in the United States]]