George Leggatt, Lord Leggatt: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 61:

</ref> finding that the Tate Gallery's viewing platform was not an ordinary use of land, and hence constituted a private nuisance in overlooking the claimant's residences.

* [https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2023/25.html ''Philipp v Barclays Bank UK PLC''] [2023] UKSC 25, finding that banks do not have a duty to prevent their customers from making payments to fraudsters.

* ''[https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2022-0038.html Paul and another v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust]''<ref>{{Cite web |date=11 January 2024 |title=Press Summary |url=https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2022-0038-0044-0049-press-summary.pdf |access-date=27 August 2024 |website=www.supremecourt.uk}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=JUDGMENT. Paul and another (Appellants) v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (Respondent |url=https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2022-0038-0044-0049-judgment.pdf |access-date=27 August 2024 |website=www.supremecourt.uk}}</ref> [2024] UKSC 1, finding that psychiatric harm is treated no differently from physical harm in the Law of Torts. Also that doctors do not owe a duty of care to members of the family of their patients to prevent them from harm caused by negligent treatment of the patient.

==Notes==