Content deleted Content added
m |
|||
Line 607: |year=1967 |isbn=0028949900 }}</ref> }}</ref> Robert Nozick in 1974 wrote, "Consider now complicated patterns which one would have thought would arise only through intelligent design."<ref>{{cite book▼ |author=[[Robert Nozick]]▼ ▲ |title=[[Anarchy, State, and Utopia]]▼ {{cite book ▲ |author=[[Robert Nozick]] ▲ |title=[[Anarchy, State, and Utopia]] |publisher=[[The Perseus Books Group]], [[Basic Books]] |location=[[USA]] |year=1974 |page=19 |isbn=0465097200 }}</ref> </ref> The phrases "intelligent design" and "intelligently designed" were used in a 1979 philosophy book ''Chance or Design?'' by James Horigan<ref>James E. Horigan, ''Chance or Design?'.' Philosophical Library, 1979.</ref> and the phrase "intelligent design" was used in a 1982 speech by Sir [[Fred Hoyle]] in his promotion of [[panspermia]].<ref>'Evolution according to Hoyle: Survivors of disaster in an earlier world', By Nicholas Timmins, ''The Times'', Wednesday, January 13, 1982; pg. 22; Issue 61130; col F. Hoyle stated in a 1982 speech: "...one arrives at the conclusion that biomaterials with their amazing measure or order must be the outcome of intelligent design". [http://telicthoughts.com/sir-fred-hoyle-and-the-origins-of-id/]</ref>▼ ▲ The modern use of the words "intelligent design", as a term intended to describe a field of inquiry, began after the [[Supreme Court of the United States]], in the case of ''[[Edwards v. Aguillard]]'' (1987), ruled that [[creationism]] is unconstitutional in public school science curricula. A Discovery Institute report says that [[Charles Thaxton]], editor of ''[[Of Pandas and People]]'', had picked the phrase up from a [[NASA]] scientist, and thought "That's just what I need, it's a good engineering term".<ref> | |||