Metascience: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 120:

=====Research questions and coordination=====

{{Excerpt|Research question|Aggregated research questions and coordination}}{{Furthermain|Research question#Aggregated research questions and coordination}}

=====Risk governance=====

{{main|Biosecurity#Future}}

{{See also|#Differential R&D}}

{{Excerpt|Biosecurity|The future|paragraphs=-2,3}}

=== Science communication and public use ===

{{See also|Science#Science and the public|#Science Education}}

It has been argued that "science has two fundamental attributes that underpin its value as a global public good: that knowledge claims and the evidence on which they are based are made openly available to scrutiny, and that the results of scientific research are communicated promptly and efficiently".<ref name="ISC1">{{cite web |title=Science as a Global Public Good |url=https://council.science/current/news/science-as-a-global-public-good/ |website=[[International Science Council]] |access-date=22 November 2021 |date=8 October 2021}}</ref> Metascientific research is exploring topics of [[science communication]] such as [[media coverage of science]], [[science journalism]] and online communication of results by science educators and scientists.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Jamieson |first1=Kathleen Hall |last2=Kahan |first2=Dan |last3=Scheufele |first3=Dietram A. |title=The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication |date=17 May 2017 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hSgmDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA51 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0190497637 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Grochala |first1=Rafał |title=Science communication in online media: influence of press releases on coverage of genetics and CRISPR |url=https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.13.875278v1.abstract |page= |language=en |doi=10.1101/2019.12.13.875278 |date=16 December 2019 |s2cid=213125031 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=FRAMING ANALYSIS OF NEWS COVERAGE ON RENEWABLE ENERGYIN THE STAR ONLINE NEWS PORTAL |url=http://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Special%20Issue%20on%20SU18/SU18_04.pdf |access-date=22 November 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=MacLaughlin |first1=Ansel |last2=Wihbey |first2=John |last3=Smith |first3=David |title=Predicting News Coverage of Scientific Articles |journal=Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media |date=15 June 2018 |volume=12 |issue=1 |doi=10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.14999 |s2cid=49412893 |url=https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14999 |language=en |issn=2334-0770|doi-access=free }}</ref> A study found that the "main incentive academics are offered for using social media is amplification" and that it should be "moving towards an institutional culture that focuses more on how these [or such] platforms can facilitate real engagement with research".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Carrigan |first1=Mark |last2=Jordan |first2=Katy |title=Platforms and Institutions in the Post-Pandemic University: a Case Study of Social Media and the Impact Agenda |journal=Postdigital Science and Education |date=4 November 2021 |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=354–372 |doi=10.1007/s42438-021-00269-x |s2cid=243760357 |language=en |issn=2524-4868|doi-access=free }}</ref> Science communication may also involve the communication of societal needs, concerns and requests to scientists.