Psychiatry: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 294:

* {{cite encyclopedia| vauthors = Ford-Martin PA | veditors = Longe JL, Blanchfield DS |date=2002 |title=Psychosis |encyclopedia=Gale Encyclopedia of Medicine |edition=2nd |volume=4 |location=Detroit |publisher=Gale Group |oclc=51166617}}

* [[Gavin Francis|Francis, Gavin]], "Changing Psychiatry's Mind" (review of [[Anne Harrington]], ''Mind Fixers: Psychiatry's Troubled Search for the Biology of Mental Illness'', Norton, 366 pp.; and [[Nathan Filer]], ''This Book Will Change Your Mind about Mental Health: A Journey into the Heartland of Psychiatry'', London, Faber and Faber, 248 pp.), ''[[The New York Review of Books]]'', vol. LXVIII, no. 1 (14 January 2021), pp. 26–29. "[M]ental disorders are different [from illnesses addressed by other medical specialties].... [T]o treat them as purely physical is to misunderstand their nature." "[C]are [needs to be] based on distress and [cognitive, emotional, and physical] need rather than [on psychiatric] diagnos[is]", which is often uncertain, erratic, and unreplicable. (p. 29.)

* [[Sue Halpern|Halpern, Sue]], "The Bull's-Eye on Your Thoughts" (review of [[Nita A. Farahany]], ''The Battle for Your Brain: Defending the Right to Think Freely in the Age of Neurotechnology'', St. Martin's, 2023, 277 pp.; and [[Daniel Barron]], ''Reading Our Minds: The Rise of Big Data Psychiatry'', Columbia Global Reports, 2023, 150 pp.), ''[[The New York Review of Books]]'', vol. LXX, no. 17 (2 November 2023), pp. 60–62. Psychiatrist [[Daniel Barron]] deplores psychiatry's reliance largely on subjective impressions of a patient's condition – on [[pattern recognition|behavioral-pattern recognition]] – whereas other medical specialties dispose of a more substantial armamentarium of objective diagnostic [[technologies]]. A psychiatric patient's [[diagnosis|diagnoses]], ofare necessity, isarguably more conspicuously in the eye of the psychiatric physician: "An [[anti-psychotic]] 'works' if a [psychiatric] patient ''looks and feels'' less [[psychotic]]." Barron suggestsposits that [[talking]] – an important featureaspect of psychiatric [[diagnostics]] and treatment – which necessarily involves vague, subjective [[language]], and therefore cannot reveal the [[brain]]'s objective workings. BarronHe hopestrusts to furnish psychiatry withthat [[Big Data]] technologies that wouldwill make psychiatric [[signs and symptoms]] more quantifiably objective. The reviewer, Sue Halpern, cautions, however, that "When numbers have no agreed-upon, scientifically-derived, extrinsic meaning, quantification is unavailing." (p. 62.)

* {{cite journal|vauthors=Hirschfeld RM, Lewis L, Vornik LA|title=Perceptions and impact of bipolar disorder: how far have we really come? Results of the national depressive and manic-depressive association 2000 survey of individuals with bipolar disorder|journal=The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry|volume=64|issue=2|pages=161–74|date=February 2003|pmid=12633125|doi=10.4088/JCP.v64n0209}}

* {{cite journal|vauthors=Krieke LV, Jeronimus BF, Blaauw FJ, Wanders RB, Emerencia AC, Schenk HM, Vos SD, Snippe E, Wichers M, Wigman JT, Bos EH, Wardenaar KJ, Jonge PD|title=HowNutsAreTheDutch (HoeGekIsNL): A crowdsourcing study of mental symptoms and strengths|journal=International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research|volume=25|issue=2|pages=123–44|date=June 2016|pmid=26395198|doi=10.1002/mpr.1495|pmc=6877205|hdl=11370/060326b0-0c6a-4df3-94cf-3468f2b2dbd6|url=https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/30435764/2015_Van_der_Krieke_Jeronimus_HowNutsAreTheDutch_A_Crowdsourcing_Study_of_Mental_Symptoms_and_Strengths.pdf|access-date=2019-12-06|archive-date=2019-08-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190802163143/https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/30435764/2015_Van_der_Krieke_Jeronimus_HowNutsAreTheDutch_A_Crowdsourcing_Study_of_Mental_Symptoms_and_Strengths.pdf}}