Talk:Andy Ngo: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 158:

:{{u|Noteduck}}, this edit is still a problem [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Andy_Ngo&diff=1029952915&oldid=1029886001]]. Jacobin is not a strong enough source to make such a comment DUE. The RStone comment is being distorted to claim he isn't a journalist since it is contrasting the author's view with Ngo's stated profession. The fact that we already have RS quoted as saying Ngo is a provocateur makes this already distortion of their opinion UNDUE. Also, since RStones is already cited, it is sloppy editing to create a new citation for the source. [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 01:48, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

:: [[User:Springee|Springee]] respectfully, you've had considerable difficulty understanding WP:DUE and other policies in the past, including on this page, so please use direct extracts rather than just brandishing them in caps and demonstrate where this interpretation is coming from. I see no reason why Jacobin is not fine here with attribution, plus the point is supported by RS Rolling Stone, for what is after all, a few words of material. I've repeatedly referred to the exact wording of both the Jacobin and Rolling Stone sources, which you've just ignored in your rebuttals. The wording could be changed to "legitimate journalist" at a pinch. There are many other parts of this page that need work and your fixation on my edits is peculiar. Here's Ngo described as a "pseudo-journalist" which buttresses the point the two sources given are making[https://abovethelaw.com/2019/09/andy-ngo-is-journalisms-problem/?rf=1] [[User:Noteduck|Noteduck]] ([[User talk:Noteduck|talk]]) 02:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

== Recent attack (the second one in three years) by left-wing protesters ==