Talk:Austronesian peoples: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 771: ::::No. You're still not a peer reviewer. It's funny how somewhere along the way you somehow decided that peer-reviewed papers you do not like are "primary sources". How long have you been in Wikipedia again? You literally changed our [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AReliable_sources&diff=1229267804&oldid=1229266417 policy]. That's scary that anyone can do that unilaterally but displays this level of ignorance at what constitutes a reliable source. Have you read that guideline? Take a look at the [[WP:STICKTOTHESOURCE|list of what are considered the most reliable sources]]. -- <small>[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:gray;">OBSIDIAN</span>]]</small><span style="font-size:medium;font-family:times new roman;">†</span><small>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:gray;">SOUL</span>]]</small> 02:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC) ::::"Consider the African food crops traveling in the opposite direction", now here we go. Your own personal theories that do not come from any paper. Just like all the other discussions before. That bananas come from Southeast Asia/New Guinea is a biological fact, that's supported by genetic evidence. Do you expect me to :I've opened an AN/I. I'll probably get banned given how Wikipedia "resolves" disputes. But congratulations, you've done it.-- <small>[[User:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:gray;">OBSIDIAN</span>]]</small><span style="font-size:medium;font-family:times new roman;">†</span><small>[[User talk:Obsidian Soul|<span style="color:gray;">SOUL</span>]]</small> 04:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC) | |||