Talk:Ben Swann: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Article Images
Content deleted Content added
Line 32: ::::::I don't have any issue with the reliability of the Daily Beast source, but it didn't verify the content. --[[User:DrFleischman|Dr. Fleischman]] ([[User talk:DrFleischman|talk]]) 05:08, 30 June 2018 (UTC) :::::::The name alone does it for me. But fair enough. [[User:Jusdafax|Jusdafax]] ([[User talk:Jusdafax|talk]]) 05:11, 30 June 2018 (UTC) ::::::::It's unacceptable to treat Swann's uncritical repetition of discredited lies about people (c.f. Pizzagate) as "investigating" or "reporting on" these nonsensical, absurd and often-malicious conspiracy theories. He did not do any such thing, and no reliable source treats his == "Widely-accepted narratives" is not NPOV, and neither is describing Sandy Hook as a "high-profile controversy" == |