Talk:Chip Berlet: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 272:

:::If you are suggesting that you do not need to follow Wikipedia rules, codes of conduct, and guidelines, then what is your purpose here? You are tying up this page with personal atacks rather than helping to edit text. I am frankly confused. As for ''argumentum ad verecundiam'', you have not understood the concept at all. You might find [[Hannah Arendt]]'s discussion of a core misunderstanding of [[Immanuel Kant]]'s [[Categorical Imperative]] useful in straightening out issues involving legitimacy of authority versus personal principle and community obligation. Especially important is the idea of [[Categorical_Imperative#Good_will.2C_duty.2C_and_the_categorical_imperative|Good Will and Duty]]. Arendt's synthesis can be found in her book ''[[Eichmann in Jerusalem]].'' Worth reading, but the explanation here on Wikipedia is quite solid. Cheers.--[[User:Cberlet|Cberlet]] ([[User talk:Cberlet|talk]]) 04:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

::::Does the above exchange have any bearing on the content of the article? [[User:Itsmejudith|Itsmejudith]] ([[User talk:Itsmejudith|talk]]) 10:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

==The other part of the Arbcom decision==