Talk:Chip Berlet: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 344:

** But the issue is how significant opinions reported in the ''Washington Times'' are. Incidentally, please do not use offensive racial epithets on talk pages. [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 02:17, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

:::I have no love for the ''Washington Times'', but it is certainly no worse as a source than the rest of what is used in this article. A little over a third of the source citations are still to articles by Berlet or his organizations. It seems to be difficult to find commentary on Berlet that doesn't come from sources connected to the subject. [[User:Joe Bodacious|Joe Bodacious]] ([[User talk:Joe Bodacious|talk]]) 02:51, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

::::There is no commentary on Berlet except that provided by Laird Wilcox. Lot's of edtiors who defend groups targeted by Berlet and other experts on right-wing extremism think that neutrality means providing parity between experts and their subjects. But it does not. [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 03:22, 2 July 2014 (UTC)