Talk:Chip Berlet: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 351:

::::::Yes and no one complains about using his comments that were published in the book edited by [[Jeffrey Kaplan (academic)|Jeffrey Kaplan]] and Heléne Lööw. We just draw the line when he leaves the academic realm and talks to a former member of an defender of a neo-confederate hate group (according to the SPLC) writing for a Unification Church-owned newspaper of all things. I mean, how far from the mainstream is that? You still have not said whether the conversation was part of an editorial (and hence not rs) or part of an article. Do you think that writers of serious encyclopedias (or serious anything) comb through the ''Washington Times'' except to learn about the people who publish it? [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 05:59, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

::::::::In short -- ''TFD does not like "Moonies"'' despite the fact the topic has naught to do with the Moonies whatsoever, and the interview should stand on its own unless the Moonies falsified it. If that is the case, say so. Otherwise "IDONTLIKETHEM" is all I see here. did that paper misquote Berlet or not? [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 11:53, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

{{od}}I actually just question the over reliance on Wilcox. Which overall isn't a major complaint. It probably would be if it continued further but would depend on extent. The only issue of parity I see personally is the absence of mixed reception or praise.[[User:Serialjoepsycho|Serialjoepsycho]] ([[User talk:Serialjoepsycho|talk]]) 12:36, 2 July 2014 (UTC)