Talk:Chip Berlet: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 385:

::::::The issue is weight. On the one hand the overwhelming majority of scholars see him as a leading writer on right-wing extremism. On the other hand a very few scholars dismiss the main scholarship in the field, of which Berlet is a leading member. Really the place to present these tiny minority views is on articles about extremism. Otherwise, we would take a couple of obscure articles by Wilcox and others and add them dozens of articles, which is a violation of neutrality. [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 23:10, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

:::::::You're making some rather grand assertions. It would be helpful if you could cite some specifics. [[User:Joe Bodacious|Joe Bodacious]] ([[User talk:Joe Bodacious|talk]]) 00:00, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

::::::::It is just a summary of what I have outlined above. You made the comment at NPOVN "King, Berlet et al. are simply political activists who have been published in books, no different than LaRouche in that regard." That shows an ignorance of the subject and I do not see that conversing with you would be productive. [[User:The Four Deuces|TFD]] ([[User talk:The Four Deuces|talk]]) 00:55, 10 July 2014 (UTC)