Talk:Deepak Chopra: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 769:

::No, the fact that someone is unhappy that the Wikipedia page about them is not the purely promotional fooferla that they wish is not notable. If their interactions with wikipedia were widely covered by reliable sources, perhaps, but that aint the case here. -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 12:52, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

:::And your expansive interpretation of COI would quickly turn Wikipedia into Promopedia with the subject of every article simply needing to post a blog piece "calling out" any editor who is not filling the article with promotional spam to prevent NPOV from being applied. -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 12:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

::::You are aware, aren't you, that the '''Huffington Post''' has been awarded the [[Pulitzer Prize]]? I think they and their readers might find it curious that WP editors are judging it a source of inferior importance to use as a source in Wikipedia. Also, you didn't answer my question, have you participated in adding any kind of pejorative information to this article? If so, you shouldn't be participating in this discussion per WP:COI. I formally ask everyone her to detail their involvement with the article and recuse themselves if necessary. Thank you. [[User:Cla68|Cla68]] ([[User talk:Cla68|talk]]) 13:02, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

==Worried well==