Talk:DreamHost: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Content deleted Content added
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 811: :::I support not archiving at all, until necessary. Turning on archiving has the appearance of wanting to "bury" evidence, like appearances of conflict of interest. 21 days is too quick. 90 days is marginal, given the history and slow activity on this article. There's some long term discussion that should stay indefinitely. [[User:Judas278|Judas278]] ([[User talk:Judas278|talk]]) 00:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC) Yes this idea of archiving is bad and it is an attempt to bury the evidence by the same people who have so far put a great deal of energy into making the entire article about Dreamhost seem like one big "Ahhh all normal". One vote against archiving right here. Had archiving been implemented earlier then I would have never known not to use dreamhost. == Recent edits by new editor == | |||