Talk:Electronic cigarette: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 1,147:

Wikipedia is not a Crystal Ball "Predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field may be included, though editors should be aware of creating undue bias to any specific point-of-view." There is an overwhelming negative bias already in the article. There are about 42 of these claims already in the article.[[User:AlbinoFerret|<span style="color:white; background-color:black; font-weight: bold; font-size: 93%;">AlbinoFerret</span>]] 12:50, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

:The text is sourced. This is a case of you don't like what the sources say. [[User:QuackGuru|<font color="Red">QuackGuru</font>]] ([[User talk:QuackGuru|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]) 16:43, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

::That is incorrect, the question doesnt point out the bias of the statements, be they positive or negative. They could also be added by consensus. The problem is that we have to many, they often duplicate each other, and they are adding to an overall bias in the article regardless of which direction they lean. [[User:AlbinoFerret|<span style="color:white; background-color:black; font-weight: bold; font-size: 93%;">AlbinoFerret</span>]] 17:05, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

== Two wikilinks is the same section is too much ==