Talk:Free market: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
Line 42: The article is well constructed from the sources cited. The sources used are varied in time, perspectives, and media. The sources are reputable and unbiased. The Washington Post articles though may be seen as biased but after reading through them, they seemed to be neutral. Though three citations stood out as incorrectly formatted, only containing a name, presumably from a published work, the year of publishing, and the name of the author. The citation numbers are 2, 8, and 25. [[User:Jrobles2795|Jrobles2795]] ([[User talk:Jrobles2795|talk]]) 01:43, 29 January 2017 (UTC) The article is very self conflicting. > Conditions that must exist for unregulated markets to behave as "free markets" are summarized at perfect competition. ... > A free market does not require the existence of competition, however it does require a framework that allows new market entrants. The whole article is jumbled with things like this. [[User:Livingfractal|living]]<sup>[[User talk:Livingfractal|frac'''t@lk''']]</sup> 02:44, 25 December 2018 (UTC) == Definition is wrong == | |||