Talk:Gamergate (harassment campaign): Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Article Images

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 16:17, 10 April 2016 view source

Torchiest

(talk | contribs)

Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers

27,270 edits

← Previous edit

Revision as of 17:12, 10 April 2016 view source

MarkBernstein

(talk | contribs)

Extended confirmed users

4,210 edits

Next edit →

Line 299:

::: The harassment campaign is part of Gamergate and must be reported here. Nintendo is not part of Gamergate and, if you feel strongly about that, can be omitted. [[User:MarkBernstein|MarkBernstein]] ([[User talk:MarkBernstein|talk]]) 16:14, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

::::You can't pick and choose content like that. Essentially every reliable source that has reported on this has included Nintendo's official response/reasoning with regard to Rapp's termination. Per [[WP:NPOV]], we can't only report Rapp's side of the story without including Nintendo's, precisely because all the sources are doing so. —[[User:Torchiest|Torchiest]] [[User talk:Torchiest|talk]][[Special:Contributions/Torchiest|edits]] 16:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

::: Of course we can pick and choose. There's a name for that: editing. And this isn't a he-said, she-said: the harassment and smear campaign is a fact, one directly pertinent to the Gamergate controversy. We can and must report it. Subsequent events and allegations do not involve Gamergate; we need not concern ourselves with them. [[User:MarkBernstein|MarkBernstein]] ([[User talk:MarkBernstein|talk]]) 17:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)