Talk:Gender of God: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 1,193:

:''"Please discuss major revisions on the talk page before making them"''. Does this somehow not apply to you? You have at no point stopped to gain consensus for adding that section - you have simply put it up and edit-warred with anybody who disagrees with its inclusion. Numerous people have expressed an opinion that it is too far off-topic, and I can't remember seeing anybody other than you supporting it. What's more, you rejected mediation that was meant to discuss it.

:Lastly, you were [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alastair_Haines&diff=227722279&oldid=227595527 recently cautioned] against making false threats. I suggest you take notice rather than flooding this page with 'warnings'. [[User:Ilkali|Ilkali]] ([[User talk:Ilkali|talk]]) 10:36, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

::Ilkali, there is abudant evidence of your disruptive behaviour at Wiki, and after two years precisely none against mine.

::But sticking to the point. Regarding CR, I asked for comments, got no criticisms in a month, have Tim's support. It is sourced text, we're adding. It doesn't even need even need consensus to add it. Sources rule. Consensus is needed to edit sources. But because we're team-players we've given people a chance to interact. Can't get fairer than that.

::It would appear you can't actually make a case against the text. You haven't ever made one, just insisted on your opinion and endless reverted. [[User:Alastair Haines|Alastair Haines]] ([[User talk:Alastair Haines|talk]]) 10:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)