Talk:Glyphosate: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 85:

:::::::::::As I have told you before, if you write neutral content based on great sources there will be no problem. [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 17:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

::::::::::::Alternatively, i can say to you: Edit in a way that is not so heavy-handed and there will be no problem. Please don't act like i'm the source of problem here. I'd love to see some acknowledgement that there is another way to go about this, than to delete people's additions and then claiming something to be policy which is not. I would have been happy to work *with* you instead of in contention against you, to develop that part of the article to be better sourced. It would have avoided stress and conflict and two edit war accusations, altogether. [[User:SageRad|SageRad]] ([[User talk:SageRad|talk]]) 18:02, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

:::::::::::::[[User:SageRad]] how would you have felt if the contested text was instead tagged with {{better source needed}} rather than outright deletion? I certainly do not wish to put words in your mouth, but if I saw text tagged like that in an article I was editing, I would immediately open up a Talk page thread to discuss it, thereby starting a collegiate approach to disputed content.<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:red; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">DrChrissy</span> ^{<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:red; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">[[User talk:DrChrissy|(talk)]]</span>} 13:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

:::::[[User:Kingofaces43]] The source I was referring to was the one in the first diff of this thread. It was published in 2015, hence my stating that you are wrong to insist it should be cited only if it is discussed in a review. Clearly, that is highly improbable.<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:red; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">DrChrissy</span> ^{<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:red; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">[[User talk:DrChrissy|(talk)]]</span>} 17:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

:::::FYI, I don't get pinged as you need to |Kingofaces43 after the the initial User:Kingofaces43. No need to do that though since this page is on my watchlist. Indeed, it's highly unlikely that such a study would be cited yet, which is an indication it's too early to be discussing content associated with the source. There is no problem in waiting, and it is the [[WP:CRYSTAL|expectation]] in such situations. Either way, there are some reviews to work with now for some content. [[User:Kingofaces43|Kingofaces43]] ([[User talk:Kingofaces43|talk]]) 22:05, 7 August 2015 (UTC)