Talk:Health of Donald Trump: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 27:

This article is ostensibly about Trump's health, but it is really a compilation of '''negative speculation''' that he is dangerous and crazy. When you include something like this "the subject of the President's mental health amounted to a "state of emergency" as "our survival as a species may be at stake" it is abundantly clear that the article is designed to express a virulent anti-Trump POV. But for the almost trivial inclusion of <u>actual medical findings</u> from medical professionals who have actually examined Trump, I would've speedied this G10 as an attack page. &ndash; [[user:Lionelt|Lionel]]^{([[user talk:Lionelt|talk]])} 19:31, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

: The article accurately reports on claims that have been widely reported in reliable sources, and which are directly relevant to the subject of the article, as mental health is part of health overall (see, e.g., [[Health of Abraham Lincoln]], [[Health of Charles Darwin]]. Most of this content was originally derived from other Wikipedia articles already reporting this content without objection, or after discussion and consensus as to their contents. This article also reports responses to those claims by the subject and other persons. I therefore propose that the "coatrack" tag be removed from this article. [[User:BD2412|<span style="background:gold">'''''bd2412'''''</span>]] [[User talk:BD2412|'''T''']] 19:41, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

::"Most of this content was originally derived from other Wikipedia articles" It's one thing to create an article for a book ''The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump.'' It's totally different to include this these wild speculations ''in a BLP.'' Can't you see the difference? &ndash; [[user:Lionelt|Lionel]]^{([[user talk:Lionelt|talk]])} 19:49, 27 July 2018 (UTC)