Talk:Intelligent design: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 655:

It wouldn't be hard to fix this article. Tweak or add about 6 sentences, take the improper "disamig" def off the beginning. Sounds like a more pleasant life for the 4 folks than eternally fending off calls for repair by a large number of people. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 11:29, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

:North8000, ID doesn't exist prominently outside of the DI. ID grew out of the teleological argument, so we need information regarding that aspect (the information that predates the DI version). That doesn't mean there are multiple prominent IDs. There is a prominent ID (a religious theory not-so-cleverly disguised as science) and a prominent teleological argument (a philosophical, ''a posteriori'' argument from design). These are the names most commonly associated with the two different concepts, and Wikipedia reflects this according to policy. As has been stated a few times in this thread now, where are the sources showing a separate, prominent ID? -- [[User:MisterDub|MisterDub]] ([[User talk:MisterDub|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/MisterDub|contribs]]) 14:31, 27 March 2012 (UTC)