Talk:Khalji dynasty: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Content deleted Content added
m |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 651: :::Mild criticism. Minorsky has been attributed for his views so I don't see why there should be a problem with the current version. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00|talk]]) 01:42, 8 March 2024 (UTC) ::::He says his work is not credible I would recommend that we remove him because his views as an Iranologist is not acceptable by a Turkologist who is known for his expertise in Khalaj [[User:Afghan.Records|Afghan.Records]] ([[User talk:Afghan.Records|talk]]) 01:29, 10 March 2024 (UTC) :::::You are currently accused of source misrepresentation in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Afghan.Records this ANI thread]. All the time you continue to avoid addressing that without good reason your talk page comments are tainted. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa|talk]]) 21:41, 10 March 2024 (UTC) ::::::Nothing more than accusation. I provided direct links for what I was accused of “miss representing” but they couldn’t defend their end. I did. [[User:Afghan.Records|Afghan.Records]] ([[User talk:Afghan.Records|talk]]) 21:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC) :::::::No, you've failed to respond at ANI. As a consequence, and absent anything to the contrary, those who of us who are uninvolved will conclude that the accusations are accurate. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa|talk]]) 21:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC) ::::::::How do I reply to it? And what am I being accused of specifically? The gaps in knowledge between me and other editors make it look like I am wrong but they don’t know any better. [[User:Afghan.Records|Afghan.Records]] ([[User talk:Afghan.Records|talk]]) 21:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC) :::::::::It's not rocket science. What are you being accused of? Read the thread. Accusations have been made with diffs stating you have breached policy. The issue is whether you comply with policy or not - "gaps in knowledge" is not the point. It's unlikely that you know policy better than other editors. If you think you haven't breached policy then explain why you think that with diffs. If you continue to fail to respond you run the risk of being sanctioned/blocked etc. Pretending it's not happening is not the answer. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa|talk]]) 22:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC) == Kashghari context == | |||