Talk:Main Page - Wikipedia
1 person in discussion
Article ImagesArchives: Sections of this page older than three days are automatically relocated to the newest archive. |
---|
001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 021 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 036 037 038 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 056 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 074 075 076 077 078 079 080 081 082 083 084 085 086 087 088 089 090 091 092 093 094 095 096 097 098 099 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 |
Main Page error reports
To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.
- Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
- Offer a correction if possible.
- References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
- Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 05:15 on 29 September 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
- Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
- Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
- No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
- Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
- Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.
Today's FA
Tomorrow's FA
Day-after-tomorrow's FA
- Could an uninvolved admin please PULL the blurb on the Israeli airstrike that killed the Hezbollah leader. The article has been orange tagged for NPOV which is an automatic pull until the tag/issues are resolved. Thanks. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Nearly an hour later, still up there. I know it's Saturday most places still but come on folks. Pinging @Sandstein, the admin who posted the blurb. I seriously doubt pulling a blurb b/c another editor orange-tagged it, would count as an "involved" action re any sanction/dispute stuff, correct me if wrong. (If one edits the most visible page on the project, I really hope one would have its talk and subpages watchlisted.) --Slowking Man (talk) 17:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Looks like the tag was just removed within the last ten minutes or so. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Articles about current events and controversial topics are continuously edited and may be tagged by anyone. That does not require pulling their blurb from the main page. Sandstein 17:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- In fairness this wasn't tagged when you posted it. But there is a very strong consensus supported by years of precedent that we do not promote orange tagged articles on the main page. NPOV tags, assuming they aren't frivolous and swiftly removed, are a showstopper at ITN. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Yes, and a tagged article will normally lack consensus to post. But once posted, normal editing processes apply. Otherwise anyone could remove an article from the main page by applying a tag. Sandstein 18:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- If there is a true legitimate NPOV problem that is identified post-posting that had been present at the time it was posted, as identified on the talk page, it is reasonable to pull the blurb. But if we're talking a drive-by POV tag posting without any commentary of what's the problem, that's useless tagging and it should be removed without removing the ITN blurb. Additionally, if material is added after the posting that swings the POV-ness of the article, that content should probably be removed or reverted. Masem (t) 18:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Right, that sounds reasonable. I don't touch stuff in that topic area with an 11-and-a-half foot pole, just being a messenger for main page talk stuff. Slowking Man (talk) 19:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- @Ad Orientem@Masem@Sandstein@Slowking Man. The problem is still there. I just posted about it at Wikipedia talk:Main Page/Errors#2024 Hezbollah headquarters strike. But ideally, we should talk about it at Talk:2024_Hezbollah_headquarters_strike#WP:V_and_NPOV_violation_in_the_background_again (which in turn refers to a section higher above where the NPOV and WP:V concerns were raised first).VR (Please ping on reply) 22:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Right, that sounds reasonable. I don't touch stuff in that topic area with an 11-and-a-half foot pole, just being a messenger for main page talk stuff. Slowking Man (talk) 19:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- If there is a true legitimate NPOV problem that is identified post-posting that had been present at the time it was posted, as identified on the talk page, it is reasonable to pull the blurb. But if we're talking a drive-by POV tag posting without any commentary of what's the problem, that's useless tagging and it should be removed without removing the ITN blurb. Additionally, if material is added after the posting that swings the POV-ness of the article, that content should probably be removed or reverted. Masem (t) 18:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Yes, and a tagged article will normally lack consensus to post. But once posted, normal editing processes apply. Otherwise anyone could remove an article from the main page by applying a tag. Sandstein 18:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- In fairness this wasn't tagged when you posted it. But there is a very strong consensus supported by years of precedent that we do not promote orange tagged articles on the main page. NPOV tags, assuming they aren't frivolous and swiftly removed, are a showstopper at ITN. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Articles about current events and controversial topics are continuously edited and may be tagged by anyone. That does not require pulling their blurb from the main page. Sandstein 17:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Looks like the tag was just removed within the last ten minutes or so. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Nearly an hour later, still up there. I know it's Saturday most places still but come on folks. Pinging @Sandstein, the admin who posted the blurb. I seriously doubt pulling a blurb b/c another editor orange-tagged it, would count as an "involved" action re any sanction/dispute stuff, correct me if wrong. (If one edits the most visible page on the project, I really hope one would have its talk and subpages watchlisted.) --Slowking Man (talk) 17:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
What happened to the 45th Chess Olympiad blurb on "In the news"? I do not think it was the oldest one when it was removed. 73.189.5.104 (talk) 00:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
- I don't believe there is a hard-and-fast rule that "entries always leave ITN in strict chronological FIFO order" though I could always be mistaken. WP:ITN mentions things like keeping the amount of white space on the main page relatively balanced. (The main page layout formatting is an abandon all hope ye who enter here sort of affair. Keeping it relatively tidy involves a good bit of just trial-and-error to my understanding.) WT:ITN might be able to go into more detail. Slowking Man (talk) 02:32, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Current DYK
Next DYK
Next-but-one DYK
Today's OTD
Tomorrow's OTD
Day-after-tomorrow's OTD
Friday's FL
(October 4)
Monday's FL
(September 30, tomorrow)
Notice to administrators: When fixing POTD errors, please update the corresponding regular version (i.e. without "protected" in the page title) in addition to the Main Page version linked below.
Today's POTD
Tomorrow's POTD
General discussion
First of all: Welcome! This page is for discussing the organization and layout of the main page. It isn't for general questions or for encyclopedic content. Yes, I know that, but nobody tells me WHERE to find the place for questions of encyclopedic content. I know as well, that I can ask on the debate page of the specific article (in this case this one, but nobody's looking there because that's not exactly a very much-frequented article. It would be nice if you could add something like If you have a general question or a question of encyclopedic content please go here.
So, I was wondering if anyone is an expert in Greek football. There are a lot of football clubs that are actually departments of big sports clubs (and the football department having a different name than the original club), and it is always hard to impossible to find information on the history of the names of those departments. Now I stumbled over the football club PAE Aris (Aris FC), which is part of the sports club AS Aris. So far, so good. Now my question: Since I'm working on a football archive I'd like to know since when the football department of AS Aris is called "PAE Aris". The club itself was founded in 1914 as "PS Aris" as a pure football team, with the "P" standing for "football". The next years, many other sports departments (e. g. basketball) evolved, so in 1926 PS Aris renamed to "AS Aris" with the "A" standing for "athletic" to reflect that there are many sports played in that club. Today, the football department is called "PAE Aris" while the sports club itself is still officially named AS Aris. I don't find any information about since when "PAE Aris" is used. I doubt that the club's football team is called that way since 1926.
So my question is: When did the name of the football department of AS Aris change to "PAE Aris"? It would be nice if someone could help me out!--31.16.72.92 (talk) 22:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
- We do have something like what you suggest at the top of this page, underneath the text that you copied to here.("For questions about using and contributing to Wikipedia") In your case I would suggest the Help Desk. 331dot (talk) 22:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
- For specific questions like this head along to Wikipedia:Reference desk/Entertainment. Stephen 22:19, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
- And also see the football project too. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 08:56, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
- For help in general to find where might be best to ask questions, first check the talk page of the article on the subject you're asking about; it might be well-trafficked and therefore a good forum. If not, there should be one or more banners for WikiProjects, which are larger projects grouping articles in a certain field; these will have general talk pages for the project as a whole (so, if I'm looking at a film but the film's article is quiet and little-read, I can ask about it at the talk page of WP:FILM). Failing that, if you have a quiet project too, you can try directly asking people who have edited the article or similar articles on their talk pages—maybe I can't find information about Manchester City WFC, but I see that someone has edited a lot of articles on the men's club, so I can ask them if they know what I need to know. GRAPPLE X 09:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps a dumb question but...—Arpose (talk) 00:15, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
- No question is truly dumb, although it may help if we knew what your question was. If you're implying "Why aren't the Nobel prize winners on the main page?", they are currently being discussed at WP:ITN/C. Hie thee hence to yon page.--WaltCip (talk) 01:03, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply