Talk:Melbourne: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Line 153:

::::::::::::You mean [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/96/Melbourne_infobox_montage_2.jpg option 2]? It's poorly put together, the skyline shot and REB are blurry for some reason, the Shrine has clearly been stretched horizontally to fit, the view from the Shrine is pretty much pointless (two Shirne-related images, why?), the Flinders shot is inferior. - [[User:HappyWaldo|HappyWaldo]] ([[User talk:HappyWaldo|talk]]) 03:47, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

:::::::::::::I mean either option. Instead of sitting there complaining about minor details, why don't you change them? I've seen little contribution from you here other than as a voice of negativity. If you're the only voice of opposition here, I think I'm going to go ahead and make a change. And when I click the current montage, I can see plenty of stretching and poor juxtaposition, but I'm not a stickler for detail that hardly matters. [[User:Ashton 29|Ashton 29]] ([[User talk:Ashton 29|talk]]) 04:29, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

:::::::::::::: I agree with HappyWaldo's assessment of this proposal. Also disagree with the previous change of the MCG image (as stated previously). Most importantly however, I find your sustained disregard of [[WP:CIVIL]] very problematic. --<small>[[User:Elekhh|ELEKHH]]^{[[User talk:Elekhh|T]]}</small> 05:12, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

== Out of date religious statistics ==