Talk:Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

Line 52:

== Neutrality ==

There is a tag on this article about disputed neutrality. If any editor has doubts about the neutrality of any section of the article please discuss here. [[User:AmirahBreen|Amirah]] ([[User talk:AmirahBreen|talk]]) 00:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

: Yes, largely because you've removed anything positive about the subject and added nothing by criticism, creating a decidedly unbalanced article. Looking at the edit history, most of the article's current content under [[Mohamed_Abdullahi_Mohamed#Presidential_term_(2017–present)]] has been [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mohamed_Abdullahi_Mohamed&type=revision&diff=996912246&oldid=978867646 added by you], and is entirely negative. At the same time, you've removed (first large tracts of text with canned edit summaries that included positive information. Examples of improper removal of positive content:

:* [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mohamed_Abdullahi_Mohamed&diff=prev&oldid=978866604 Here, you removed the entire "Reforms" section] with the edit summary "Immediate removal of unsourced contentious material about a living person according to Wikipedia guidelines." That's a complete misapplication of BLP policy; that section was reasonably sourced, and had absolutely no BLP violations.

Line 59 ⟶ 58:

:: I restored most of this content to the article. The [[Mohamed_Abdullahi_Mohamed#Presidential_term_(2017–present)]] section is still heavily weighted towards negative material, so I think the disputed neutrality tag should stay on until someone can revise it to present a more balanced view. [[User:Rublov|Rublov]] ([[User talk:Rublov|talk]]) 19:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

::: Agreed; that section still feels rather lopsided in terms of criticism. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|^Talk]]</b> 19:51, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

The material I removed did not have citations, it was contentious because there are elections coming up and it is unfair on opposition candidates and undemocratic for politicians to have uncited material in their favour which puts them at an unfair advantage. If you re-instate any of the material which I removed please do at least make sure it is properly cited. [[User:AmirahBreen|Amirah]] ([[User talk:AmirahBreen|talk]]) 13:13, 1 January 2021 (UTC)